HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
SAKINUR HASSAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 3949 / 2025
GAHC010153892025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3949/2025
SAKINUR HASSAN
S/O SRI SOFIQUL ISLAM, VILL- CHAMDHARA, P.O.- DAGAON, DIST-
NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782124
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM,
PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR,
GUWAHATI-781001 2:THE SECRETARY
TELIA BEBEJIA GAON PANCHAYAT
P.O. AND P.S.- JURIA
DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-782124
3:SMTI. NAYAN MONI RAVA BORA
W/O SRI PRABIN CH. BORA
VILL- TELIA BEBEJIA BAMUNGAON
P.O. AND P.S.- JURIA
DIST- NAGAON
ASSAM
PIN-78212
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D. A. Kaiyum, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Ms. P. Thapa, Standing Counsel
: Mr. S. Zaman, Advocate
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 22.10.2025 Mr. D. A. Kaiyum, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that there was a mistake in mentioning the name of the Respondent No.3 inasmuch as, the name of the Respondent No.3 should have been Smti Nayan Moni Rava and not Smti Nayan Moni Rava Bora. He therefore submits that he may be permitted to make necessary correction to the same.
2. Mr. S. Zaman, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent No. 3 i.e. Smti. Nayan Moni Rava also submits that actually the name should have been Smti Nayan Moni Rava and not Smti Nayan Moni Rava Bora.
3. Accordingly, the learned counsel for the Petitioner is directed to file a fresh Memo of Parties before the Registry of this Court within 2 (two) days and on the basis thereof, the Registry shall make necessary correction to the Cause Title as well as upload the same in the CIS.
4. Mr. S. Zaman, the learned counsel for the Respondent No.3 submits that he may be permitted to file a reply.
5. The learned Standing counsel for the State Respondents also submits that they would like to file their reply.
6. List this matter again on 17.11.2025.
7. The said affidavit-in-opposition be filed on behalf of the Respondents on or before 14.11.2025.
8. Ms. P. Thapa, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 shall also ensure that the records of the settlement proceedings are available before this Court on 17.11.2025.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.