HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ASIF HUSSAIN MAZUMDER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 372 / 2026
##PAGE1##
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010008152026
2026:GAU-AS:968
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/372/2026
ASIF HUSSAIN MAZUMDER
S/O- MOZZAM HUSSAIN MAZUMDER, RESIDENT OF SATGAON ROAD,
BAGARBARI, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN- 781037
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
ASSAM, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, DISPUR,
GUWAHATI-6
2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
3:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6
4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PHE WATER ASSAM
HENGRABARI
GUWAHATI
5:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
(PHE) SANITATION
ASSAM
HENGRABARI
GUWAHATI-36
##PAGE2##Page No.# 2/4
6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (PHE)
GUWAHATI DIVISION -1
BAMUNIMAIDAM
GUWAHATI-21
7:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (PHE)
SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR DIVISION
HATSINGIMARI
SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR
PIN- 78313
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.M.S. Mazumder, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Gogoi, Advocate
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
28.01.2026
Date :
Heard Mr. A.M.S. Mazumder, the learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. R.R. Gogoi, the learned Standing
Counsel appears on behalf of the respondents.
2. The petitioner herein has assailed the order dated
03.01.2026 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from
the Office of the Executive Engineer (PHE), Guwahati Division-I
to the Office of the Executive Engineer (PHE), South Salmara,
Mankachar Division against an existing vacancy w.e.f. the date
of taking over charge and until further orders.
3. The grievances of the petitioner herein are that the
petitioner is suffering from various ailments and that the
##PAGE3##Page No.# 3/4
parents of the petitioner are also suffering from various
ailments. In that regard, the petitioner submitted a
representation on 07.01.2026 which has not yet been
considered by the Respondent Authorities.
4. This Court has enquired with the learned counsels
appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as the
respondents, as to how, may many years the petitioner has
been stationed at Guwahati.
5. It has been submitted at the bar that the petitioner has
been stationed in Guwahati for the last 12 (twelve) years.
6. This Court has also given an anxious consideration to the
respective submissions and has also perused the materials on
record.
7. Transfer is an incidence of the petitioner’s service and the
Respondent Authorities have the authority to transfer the
petitioner from one place to another.
8. It is no longer res integra that the scope of interference
with a transfer order is very limited and sans a case of mala fide
or extreme hardships, the writ Court ought not to exercise
jurisdiction to interfere with the transfer order, that too, when
the transfer is made in administrative exigency.
9. Considering the above, this Court, does not find any ground
##PAGE4##Page No.# 4/4
to interfere with the transfer order dated 03.01.2026.
10. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed.
11. Before parting with the record, this Court, however,
observes that since the petitioner has submitted a
representation dated 07.01.2026, the respondents shall duly
consider the same and intimate the petitioner of the outcome
within a period of 7 (seven) days from today. While considering
the representation, the concerned Respondent Authorities shall
deal on its merits without being influenced by the dismissal of
the present writ petition.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Order downloaded on 31-01-2026 07:51:22 AM
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.