Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Unknown, J
Abdul Kader – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellants convicted for transporting timber without permits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for appeal based on witness reliability and evidence credibility. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. court observed the need for strict adherence to laws in forest protection. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 15 , 16 , 20) |
| 4. sentence reduced considering the personal circumstances of the appellants. (Para 19 , 21) |
1. Trial Court held the petitioners guilty of offence under S.42 of the Indian Forest Act for violation of Tripura Forest Transit Rules , 1952 and after conviction, sentenced each of them to Simple Imprisonment (SI) for 6 (six) months. In appeal, the Sessions court upheld the said conviction and sentence of the appellants and dismissed their appeal. Aggrieved appellants, have, therefore, challenged the impugned judgment and order dated 15.02.2019 passed by the learned Sessions Judge of Dhalai Judicial District in Criminal Appeal No.01 of 2018 where by the learned Sessions Judge upheld their conviction and sentence awarded by the trial court and dismissed their appeal.
2. Essential facts necessary for disposal of the case are as under:
On the tip of information received from secret source, the Of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
