Back
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Robin Phukan, J.
Kakoli Goswami v. State of Assam
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts of the case initiated by a complaint. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on the legality of the order against the petitioner. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of the application of s.319 crpc. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. final decision quashing the impugned order. (Para 13 , 14) |
1. Heard Mr. S.J. Sarmah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, appearing for the State respondent No.1 and Mr. A.A. Dewan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2.
2. Correctness or otherwise of the order dated 28.01.2019, passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kaliabor, Nagaon, in PRC Case No.232/2017, registered under S.420/468/409 of the IPC is challenged in this petition under S.482 read with S.397 and S.401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. It is to be noted here that vide impugned order dated 17.03.2021 the learned Court below has invoked the jurisdiction under S.319 CrPC and impleaded the petitioner as one of the accused in the aforementioned case.
3. The background facts leading to filing of the present petition is briefly stated as under: -
"On 08.09.2016 one
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
