Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
, J
Kartik Dey – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of conviction and sentence (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. defense arguments pointing out deficiencies in prosecution (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. prosecution's case supported by victim's testimony (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. witness testimonies corroborating the victim's account (Para 11 , 12 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. judgment rationale refers to evidentiary standards (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. final judgment and upholding of conviction (Para 26) |
1. This appeal is directed challenging the judgment and order of sentence and conviction dated 20.07.2023 delivered by Learned Special Judge (POCSO), West Tripura, Agartala in connection with Case No. Special (POCSO) 43 of 2021. By the said judgment, Learned Special Judge found the appellant to be guilty and convicted and sentence him to suffer simple imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- for the offence punishable under S.8 of the POCSO Act , in default of payment of fine, the convict shall suffer simple imprisonment for further one month and to suffer simple imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence punishable under S.448 of IPC , in default of payment of fine, the convict shall suffer simple impr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
