Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
XXX, J
Rakhal Debnath – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction details and factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding evidence and trial conduct. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. judicial observations on the implications of fir delay and witness credibility. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's rationale for conviction under the pocso act. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. conclusion and order regarding the appeal. (Para 15) |
1. This appeal is preferred challenging the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 27.07.2023 delivered by Learned Special Judge (POCSO), North Tripura, Dharmanagar in connection with Case No.Special (POCSO) 03 of 2021. By the said judgment, Learned Special Judge convicted the appellant under S.354 of IPC and sentenced him to suffer RI for three years and to pay fine of Rs.1000/-, id to suffer further imprisonment for one month and the Learned Special Judge also convicted the appellant under S.8 of the POCSO Act and sentenced him to suffer RI for three years and to pay fine of Rs.1000/-, id to suffer further imprisonment for one month and it was also ordered that both the sentences shall run concurrently.
2. Heard Mr. B. Deb, Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appel
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
