GAHC010021142026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : AB/281/2026 SHAIDUL ALOM LASKAR ALIAS SHAIDUL ALAM SON OF ABU BAKKAR LASKAR RESIDENT OF BOGORIJURI TINIALI, NO. 1 KOHORA P.S. BOKAKHAT, IN THE DISTRICT OF GOLAGHAT, ASSAM, PIN-785609, VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T BARUAH, MS A DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA O R D E R Date : 11.02.2026.

Heard Ms. P. Bora, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. A. Das, learned engaged counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing on behalf of the respondent State.

This is an application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 praying for grant of pre- arrest bail to the accused/petitioner, namely, Shaidul Alom Laskar @ Shaidul Alam, who is apprehending arrest in connection with the Dolamara P.S. Case No.

02/2026, registered under Sections 303(1)/316(4) of the BNS, 2023.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides, I find it justified to provide interim protection to the present petitioner till receipt of the case diary so that he can appear before the learned investigating officer and the I.O. can record his statement.

Accordingly, it is provided that in the event of arrest of the accused/petitioner, namely, Shaidul Alom Laskar @ Shaidul Alam, in connection with the Dolamara P.S. Case No. 02/2026, he shall be enlarged on interim pre-arrest bail on executing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) only, with one surety of like amount, to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer within 7 (seven) days;

(ii) that the petitioner shall fully co-operate with the investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required in connection with the investigation of the aforesaid P.S. case; and (iii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

List the matter on 05.03.2026, for case diary.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant