SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 2006

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
RAM SINGH CHOTRI AND 4 ORS. – Appellant
Versus
HILAL UDDIN BARBHUIYA AND 6 ORS – Respondent
CRP(IO) / 404 / 2024



GAHC010201272024 2026:GAU-AS:1773 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : CRP(IO)/404/2024 RAM SINGH CHOTRI AND 4 ORS.

S/O- LATE JAGANNATH SINGH CHOTRI, R/O- VILL.- KATLICHERRA GRANT, P.O. AND P.S. KATLICHERRA, DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM

2: DHARAM SINGH CHOTRI S/O- LATE JAGANNATH SINGH CHOTRI R/O- VILL.- KATLICHERRA GRANT P.O. AND P.S. KATLICHERRA DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM

3: BEER SINGH CHOTRI S/O- LATE JAGANNATH SINGH CHOTRI R/O- VILL.- KATLICHERRA GRANT P.O. AND P.S. KATLICHERRA DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM

4: JOYDIP SINGH CHOTRI S/O- LATE JAGANNATH SINGH CHOTRI R/O- VILL.- KATLICHERRA GRANT P.O. AND P.S. KATLICHERRA DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM

5: PUNOM SINGH CHOTRI S/O- LATE JAGANNATH SINGH CHOTRI R/O- VILL.- KATLICHERRA GRANT P.O. AND P.S. KATLICHERRA DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSA VERSUS HILAL UDDIN BARBHUIYA AND 6 ORS S/O- LATE AZIZUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA, VILL.- DARIARGHAT GRANT, P.O. KARICHERRA, P.S. RAMNATHPUR, DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN-

788165.

2:TAZAMUL ALI BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE AZIZUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA VILL.- DARIARGHAT GRANT P.O. KARICHERRA P.S. RAMNATHPUR DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788165.

3:NUR UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE AZIZUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA VILL.- DARIARGHAT GRANT P.O. KARICHERRA P.S. RAMNATHPUR DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788165.

4:AHADUR RAHMAN LASKAR S/O- LATE ABDUL JOBBAR LASKAR VILL.- DARIARGHAT GRANT P.O. KARICHERRA P.S. RAMNATHPUR DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788165.

5:JAKIR HUSSAIN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE SIRUJ ALI BARBHUIYA VILL.- DARIARGHAT GRANT P.O. KARICHERRA P.S. RAMNATHPUR DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788165.

6:MOINUL HAQUE BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE ABDUL JALIL BARBHUIYA VILL.- DARIARGHAT GRANT P.O. KARICHERRA P.S. RAMNATHPUR DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788165.

7:SHAMS UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE ABDUL JALIL BARBHUIYA VILL.- DARIARGHAT GRANT P.O. KARICHERRA P.S. RAMNATHPUR DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788165 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M S MAZUMDER, Advocate for the Respondent : MR M J QUADIR (R-1,2,3), AKHINUR ISLAM(R-1,2,3),MR. A K HANNAN(R-1,2,3)

BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA

ORDER

10-02-2026 Heard Mr. A. M. S. Mazumder, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.

J. Quadir, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 115/151 of the CPC challenging the impugned order dated 26.07.2024, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Hailakandi in Misc Case No.168/2024 in Title Suit No. 89/2023, whereby, rejected the Petition filed by the petitioner for granting leave to file Counter Claim was rejected and returned the Counter Claim to the petitioner.

3. It is submitted by Mr. Mozumder, learned counsel for the petitioner that opposite party/respondent Nos. 1, 2, and 3 instituted a title suit being T.S. No. 89/2023 for declaration of their right, title and interest over the two plots of land which has been mentioned in schedule covered by different dags and along with the said title suit, the respondents also filed misc application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC praying for ad-interim/temporary and permanent injunction in respect of the suit land.

4. After receiving the notices/summons from the Court, the petitioners being the defendants entered into appearance and on 13.12.2023 they filed their written objection in Misc. Case No.162/2023 and thereafter the Trial Court had also passed an order dated 04.01.2024 in the said misc. case directing both the parties to maintain status quo in respect of the suit land, till disposal of the connected Title Suit. Thereafter, the respondents also filed a misc. application under Order 39 Rule 2(A) against the petitioner as well as other proforma respondents with false and concocted allegation of violation of temporary ad- interim injunction dated 25.08.2023, wherein, the present petitioners had filed their written objection. But, while the status quo order was operating, the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 started construction of Pucca structure over the suit la

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top