SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 2339

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
JUNMONI DAS AND 5 ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 6528 / 2025



GAHC010245812025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/6528/2025 JUNMONI DAS AND 5 ORS SON OF DIPAK DAS,VILLAGE- MALAIBARI, P.O- MALAIBARI,P.S KHETRI, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 782403,POST NAME- CONSTABLE (AB) ROLL NO. 11004968

2: MRINMOY DAS SON OF SHRI KHAGEN DAS VILLAGE- MALAIBARI P.O.- MALAIBARI P.S. KHETRI DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M)

ASSAM PIN- 782403 POST NAME- CONSTABLE (AB) ROLL NO. 11005230

3: PABITRA DAS SON OF RAMLAL DAS VILLAGE- MALAIBARI (HIRAPARA)

P.O- MALAIBARI P.S.- KHETRI DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M)

ASSAM PIN- 782403 POST NAME- CONSTABLE (AB)

ROLL NO.- 11006454

4: PARASHJYOTI BHUYAN SON OF CHITRA BHUYAN VILLAGE- HATIUTHA P.O.- JHARGAON P.S. JAGIROAD DISTRICT- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782411 POST NAME- CONSTABLE (AB) ROLL NO.- 11720606

5: PINKU DEKA SON OF DIMBESWAR DEKA VILLAGE- MANAHA BELGURI P.O.- MANAHA P.S. JAGIROAD DISTRICT- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782411 POST NAME- CONSTABLE (AB)

ROLL NO.- 11720557 6: HIRAN BAISHYA SON OF RIPU BAISHYA VILLAGE- MANAHA KACHARIGAON P.O.- MANAHA KACHARIGAON P.S. JAGIROAD DIISTRICT- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782411 POST NAME- CONSTABLE (AB)

ROLL NO. 1171972 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN- 781006

2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI PIN- 781007

3:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (A)

ASSAM AND MEMBER CONVENOR STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD (SLPRB)

ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781007

4:THE STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN REHABARI GUWAHATI PIN- 781008

5:THE CHAIRMAN STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD ASSAM REHABARI GUWAHATI PIN- 78100 For the petitioner (s) : Mr. A. M. Ahmed, Advocate For the respondent (s) : Mr. D. Nath, Sr. Govt. Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R

02.02.2026 Issue notice making it returnable on 13.02.2026.

2. Mr. D. Nath, the learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 5. Extra copies of the writ petition be served upon him during the course of the day.

3. Six petitioners have joined together and filed the instant writ petition being aggrieved by the manner of selection carried out to the various posts of Constable (UB) and Constable (AB) in the Assam Police in pursuance to the advertisement dated

06.10.2023.

4. This Court has perused the advertisement dated 06.10.2023 and from the same, it appears that 1645 posts of Constable (UB) and 2300 posts of Constable (AB) in Assam Police and 1 post of Constable (UB) in APRO were to be filled up pursuant to the said advertisement. It is also seen that the vacancies mentioned in the advertisement were tentative and it may vary which would be intimated in due course.

5. The grievances of the petitioners herein are that the petitioners have come to learn from the website as regards their marks in the PET + PST as well as in the CWT. However, the petitioners are not aware of their marks in the viva-voce examination.

6. It is the further case of the petitioners that the final result of the selection has been declared on the website on 11.10.2025. As on date, there is still no select list published, and as such, the petitioners are also not aware as regards the cut-off marks.

7. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners further submitted that when the petitioners have searched the website as to whether the petitioners have been selected or not, after providing their names as well as the Roll Numbers, what appears is whether the particular candidate has been selected or not. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that recruitment to those posts fall within the ambit of Article 16 of the Constitution. Therefore, it is the mandate of law that such recruitment should be fair, transparent and without violating the equality clause. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners further su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top