SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 3471

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
BIJOY BORO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 613 / 2026



GAHC010009592026 2026:GAU-AS:2074 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/613/2026 BIJOY BORO S/O- LT. LOHIT BORO, R/O- VILLAGE- KATAJHAR GAON, P.O.-

GABARDHANA, PIN- 781315, P.S. GABARDHANA, DIST.- BAKSA (BTC), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, WELFARE OF PLAIN TRIBES AND BACKWARD CLASSES, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6

2:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL AREA DISTRICTS AT KOKRAJHAR REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY P.O.- KOKRAJHAR DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR (BTAD)

ASSAM PIN- 783370

3:THE SECRETARY MARKET AND FAIRS DEPARTMENT BODOLAND AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL AT KOKRAJHAR P.O. KOKRAJHAR DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR (BTAD)

ASSAM PIN- 78337 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. ASMINA BEGUM, MR M H CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, BTC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

ORDER

Date : 13-02-2026 Heard Ms. A Begum, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms.

B Bhuyan, learned senior counsel as well as the learned Standing Counsel, BTC appearing for respondent Nos. 2 & 3 and Ms. U Das, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1.

[2.] Having considered the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the writ petition is taken up for disposal at this motion stage itself. It is the case of the petitioner that he has filed an application before the Secretary, Market and Fairs Department, BTC for issuance of a license to the petitioner for running a private cattle market on Schedule-A of the land mentioned in the said representation. The said representation was submitted through speed post on 26.09.2025 (Annexure-3). But the same having not been considered, the petitioner is before this Court.

[3.] The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the limited prayer of the petitioner, at this stage is for directing the respondent authority concerned to consider the petitioner’s representation and dispose of the same in accordance with law.

[4.] Ms. B Bhuyan, learned Standing Counsel, BTC submits that Court may consider passing appropriate orders as may deem fit and proper.

[5.] Considering the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authority, more particularly, respondent No. 3 to consider and dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner on 26.09.2025 in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 6 (six) weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

[6.] The petitioner shall also furnish a copy of the writ petition to respondent No. 3 along with a certified copy of this order for doing the needful. Thereafter, the order to be passed by the respondent No. 3 shall be communicated to the petitioner.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Order downloaded on 19-02-2026 11:09:58 PM

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top