SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 3636

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
TARAPADA DAS AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 6017 / 2025



GAHC010232562025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/6017/2025 TARAPADA DAS AND ANR S/O- MADAN MOHAN DAS, RESIDENT OF- VILLAGE- NOWAPARA, VTC-

NOWAPARA NO. 2, P.O.- MANIKPUR, SUB DISTRICT- MANIKPUR, DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 783392

2: GAUTAM DAS S/O- LATE NAGENDRA CHANDRA DAS RESIDENT OF- VTC- CHOTOBAREGASH P.O.- AMBARI SUB DISTRICT- SRIJANGRAM DISTRICT BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 78338 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, JANATA BHAWAN ASSAM SECRETARIAT COMPLEX, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006

2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE JANATA BHAWAN ASSAM SECRETARIAT COMPLEX DISPUR GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM KAHILIPARA BONGAIGAON ASSAM

5:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS BONGAIGAON DISTRICT CIRCLE BONGAIGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A R BHUYAN, MR N A MAZARBHUIYA,MR M KHAN,MR N Z CHOUDHURY,S LASKAR,MR S ABDULLAH Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, SC, FINANCE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

ORDER

Date : 13.02.2026 Heard Mr. A. R. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioners.

By filing this writ petition, the petitioners, who claim to have been appointed as Assistant Teacher in Banglapara and Sonakhuli M.E. Schools in the year 1993 and 1994, respectively, have prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to release their current as well as arrear salaries.

It is contended that after their appointment, the petitioners were posted to other schools, where they duly joined; however, after the initial payment of salary, no further salary was paid to them.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a similar issue was considered by this Court in WP(C) No. 3428/2021, dated 30.07.2021, wherein the claim for arrear and current salary was directed to be paid to the petitioner. Accordingly, he prays that similar relief may be granted to the present petitioners.

Issue notice, returnable by 4 (four) weeks.

As Mr. G. Pegu, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education Department for the respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4 and Ms. A. Borthakur, learned Standing Counsel, Finance Department for the respondent No. 2, have entered appearance and accepted notice on behalf of the respondents, no formal notice need be issued to the said respondents. However, requisite extra-copies of the writ petition along with the documents appended thereto be furnished to them during the course of the day.

Steps for service of notice upon the respondent No. 5 be taken by speed post as well as by usual process within a week.

List the matter after 4 (four) weeks JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top