SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 5513

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Rajesh Mazumdar, J
KHANDAKAR ABUL HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
I.A.(Civil) / 231 / 2026



GAHC010006792026 2026:GAU-AS:1735 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/231/2026 KHANDAKAR ABUL HUSSAIN SON OF KH ANOWAR ALI,RESIDENT OF P.O. GUGUBARI, DISTRICT BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 6

2:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6

3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6

4:JOINT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6

5:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BARPETA ZILLA PARISHAD P.O. BARPETA DISTRICT BARPETA ASSAM

6:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BARPETA DISTRICT BARPETA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S DAS, MR. T DEWAN Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, P AND R.D.,SC, FINANCE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

ORDER

Date : 09-02-2026 Heard Mr. B. Singha, learned counsel for the applicant and also heard Mr.

A. Roy, learned Standing counsel for the respondents.

Mr. B. Singha, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in WP(C) No. 3561/2018, the name of the applicant had appeared as “KH Abdul Hussain” which should be actually recorded as “Khandakar Abul Hussain”.

Mr. A. Roy, learned Standing counsel for the P&RD department has submitted that the correction in the order of the disposed writ petition perhaps the same may be not carried out and it ought to be left upon the applicant to do the necessities with adequate proof to the respondents to show that the applicant is the same person.

I.A(C) is supported by an affidavit.

At the request of Mr. B. Singha, learned counsel for the applicant, this Court disposed of the application allowing the applicant to appear before the respondents authorities for grant of relief already granted in the writ petition by taking the correct name of the applicant on record and doing needful.

I.A(C) stands disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top