SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 6997

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
JABED ALI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 1340 / 2026



GAHC010036302026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/1340/2026 JABED ALI S/O LATE KASHEM ALI, VILL. DANKINAMARI, P.O. HAPACHARA, P.S.

BONGAIGAON, DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM 783390 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.

OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006

2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BONGAIGAON P.O.- BONGAIGAON P.S.- BONGAIGAON DIST.- BOONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783380

3:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MAGISTRACY BRANCH BONGAIGAON P.O.- BONGAIGAON

ASSAM

PIN- 783380

4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

ZILLA PARISHAD

ASSAM PIN- 783380

5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MANIKPUR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK P.O.- MANIKPUR P.S.- MANIKPUR DISST.- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783392

6:ZAKKIR HUUSSAIN S/O- AMSER ALI WARD MEMBER WARD NO.9 VILLAGE- DANKINAMARI P.O.- HAPACHARA P.S.- BONGAIGAON DIST.- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 78339 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S AHMED, MR M RAHMAN,T UDDIN Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, P AND R.D.

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

ORDER

09.03.2026 Heard Mr. S. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat & Rural Development Department for the respondent nos. 1, 4 & 5; Mr.

S.R. Baruah, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2 & 3. The petitioner contested in the election for Ward Member from Ward no. 9 Dankinamari Ward under no. 15 Chouraguri Gaon Panchayat, Bongaigaon in the last Panchayat General Election in May, 2025 wherein the respondent no. 6 was a contestant. Upon declaration of results, the respondent no. 6 was declared elected as a Ward Member from no. 9 Dankinamari Ward. After his election as Gaon Panchayat Ward Member, a child was born to him on 13.08.2025. According to the petitioner, such birth of child has made the respondent no. 6 ineligible to continue as Ward Member of the Gaon Panchayat Ward Member in terms of Rule 62[1][b] of the Assam Panchayat [Constitution] Rules, 1995 read with Section 111[2] of the Assam Panchayat Act, 1994, as amended. In order to initiate proceeding for removal of the respondent no. 6, the petitioner had submitted a complaint before the Secretary, no. 15 Chouraguri Gaon Panchayat on 20.01.2026. Aggrieved by alleged inaction on the part of the respondent authorities, more particularly, Secretary, no. 15 Chouraguri Gaon Panchayat to act on the complaint, the petitioner is before this Court by the instant writ petition.

At this stage, Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission to file pleadings for impleadment of the necessary party.

The prayer is allowed.

List the case on 20.03.2026.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top