SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 7639

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ANIL KUMAR SINGHA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 1664 / 2026



##PAGE1##

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010058122026

undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/1664/2026

ANIL KUMAR SINGHA S/O- LATE BIRENDRA SINGHA, MANIPURI LANGUAGE TEACHER (MLT), DALU HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, CACHAR, VILLAGE- SALCHAPRA,

DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM

VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM,DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, DISPUR,GUWAHATI-6.

2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR

GUWAHATI-6

3:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA

GUWAHATI-19

4:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER CACHAR P.O.

P.S. SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM

5:THE TREASURY OFFICER CACHAR P.O.

P.S. SILCHAR

##PAGE2##

Page No.# 2/3

DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BARBHUIYA, MS S R MAZARBHUIYA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU., SC, FINANCE DEPTT.,SC, ELEM. EDU

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

ORDER

Date : 23.03.2026

Heard Mr. A.M. Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner prays for a direction to the respondent authorities to release the arrear salary for the period from

01.02.2007 to 29.02.2012 with interest.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was appointed as Manipuri Language Teacher at Baikuntha Roy M.E. School in the district of Cachar on 23.06.1991. On 08.02.2007, the service of the petitioner was terminated, however, in terms of the order of the Assam Administrative Tribunal, the petitioner was reinstated. Thereafter, he is receiving his salary since 2012. However, the respondents have failed to release the arrear salary from 01.02.2007 to 29.02.2012, during which the service of the petitioner was terminated. It is contended by the petitioner that although during the said period, the petitioner was not in service, however, in view of the observation made by the Assam Administrative Tribunal, the petitioner is entitled to the

arrear salary for the period from 01.02.2007 to 29.02.2012.

4. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable by four weeks.

5. Since Ms. S. Chutia, learned standing counsel, Elementary Education

##PAGE3##

Page No.# 3/3 Department; Mr. A. Chaliha, learned standing counsel, Finance Department; and Ms. N.M. Sarma, learned standing counsel, Secondary Education Department have entered appearance and accepted notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 4; 2 and 5; and 3 respectively, no formal notice is required to be issued to the said respondents. However, extra copies of the petition be furnished to them

within three working days from today. 6. List the matter after four weeks.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Order downloaded on 26-03-2026 01:50:17 AM

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top