SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 7860

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J
Abu Bakkar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
WP(C)/1616/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A R Bhuyan, S Laskar, N A Mazarbhuiya, N Z Choudhury
For the Respondents: GA, Assam, SC, Revenue, SC, Forest

The onus rests upon occupants of forest land to prove legal authorization; possession of welfare-related documents like Aadhar or Ration cards does not confer legal title to forest land, and proven encroachments on reserved forests require prompt removal to uphold environmental balance.

Headnote:(A) Assam State Forest Regulation, 1891 - Regulation 17 - Removal of encroachment - Procedure for determining unauthorized occupation - Whether documents like Aadhar, Ration card, or Panchayat inclusion confer title to land within a notified Reserve Forest - Held, these documents represent personal identity or welfare scheme benefits and do not confer title or authority to occupy land within a notified forest area. (Paras 16, 23, 25)

(B) Writ Petition - Interim Relief - Principles for grant of stay - Balance of convenience and irreparable injury - Where petitioners are found encroaching on notified Reserve Forest after following due process and field verification using GPS coordinates, interim stay on eviction orders is not sustainable as it would further degrade forest land, which is contrary to public interest. (Paras 25, 26)

Facts of the case:
Twenty petitioners were issued notices by the Divisional Forest Officer to vacate land in the Jamuna Mondanga Reserve Forest. Despite the formation of a District Level Committee to examine claims and the opportunity to produce evidence, the Committee concluded via field verification and GPS coordinates that the petitioners were indeed encroaching on notified forest land. The petitioners challenged the order, arguing that welfare benefits and panchayat inclusion imply the land is revenue land, not forest land.

Findings of Court:
The court affirmed that the District Level Committee complied with the procedural safeguards mandated by the Supreme Court. The court held that administrative welfare documents cannot supersede the legal status of notified forest land and refused to grant an interim stay on the eviction notice, emphasizing the necessity of preserving forest cover.

Issues: Whether the District Level Committee properly determined the occupation was unauthorized and whether the petitioners established a prima facie case for an interim stay on the eviction order.

Ratio Decidendi: The onus to prove legal possession of land in a notified reserve forest lies with the occupier. Administrative reliance on welfare documents does not negate established forest boundaries verified by GPS/ground survey, and public interest in forest conservation precludes granting a stay against eviction of proven encroachers.

Result: Prayer for interim stay of the speaking order dated 07-03-2026 rejected.

Table of Content
1. summary of events leading to the eviction order and the formation of the district level committee. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. appellants' arguments concerning the onus of proof and claimed authorization based on government benefits. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. respondents' arguments on the validity of forest demarcation and regulatory authority. (Para 16 , 17)
4. court's analysis of procedural compliance with supreme court mandates and balance of convenience. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)

ORDER

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR

Heard Mr. A.R. Bhuyan, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.N. Goswami, learned Addl. AG, Assam appearing for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition is being filed challenging the order dated 07-03-2026, issued in respect of each of the writ petitioners, by the Divisional Forest Officer, South Nagaon Division-cum-Member Secretary, District Level Committee, Hojai for Removal of Forest Encroachment, directing each of the petitioners to vacate the plot of land under their unauthorized occupation in the reserve forest involved.

3. The petitioners in the present writ petition have projected that they are residing in Pachim Jamuna Gaon village in the district of Hojai for a substantial period of time. The petitioners were issued with show-cause notices dated 21-07-2025 and 24-07-2025 directing them to vacate the land in their possession within 07 (seven) days. Being aggrieved the petitioners have approached this Court by way of filing the present writ petition.

4. A Coordinate Bench of this Court upon noticing the issue arising in the writ petition, while issuing notice, proceeded vide order dated 29-07-2025 to direct that the time period given to the petitioner to vacate the land in question be extended till 07-08-2025 and till such time no forceful eviction be carried out. It was further clarified that after 07-08-2025, the State would be within its bound to take steps for eviction and conservation of the forest land.

5. Being aggrieved the petitioners had assailed the order dated 29-07-2025, before the Division Bench of this Court by way of instituting a writ appeal being W.A. No. 251/2025. The Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 18-08-2025, gave a final consideration to the said writ appeal and upon considering the issue arising in the matter proceeded to dispose of the said writ appeal by observing that an extended period of time having been granted to the appellants to make their good their exit from the forest area, if the appellants do not leave the forest area within a period of 07 days to be counted from the date of order, the State would proceed against them for eviction.

6. Being aggrieved the petitioners, herein, had approached the Hon’ble Supreme Court by way of instituting SLP being SLP No. 23647-23648/2025 Abdul Khalek & Ors. Vs. State of Assam and Ors. The Hon’ble Supreme Court upon considering the said SLP along with the other SLPs instituted in the matter and also writ petition instituted before it under Article 32 of the Constitution of India proceeded vide order dated 10-02-2026 to dispose of the said proceeding by directing that the process of eviction be carried out complying with the procedure laid down by the Government under the policy adopted in the matter.

7. In terms of the policy noticed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in its said order dated 10-02-2026, the respondent authorities in the Department of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, proceeded to constitute a Joint Committee of Revenue and Forest officials at the district level for examining the claims of the petitioners in the present writ petition. The terms of reference of the said Committee was also set out in the said notification dated 17-02-2026.

8. The said Committee, thereafter, on drawing a prima facie conclusion that the petitioners in the present writ petition were occupying land wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top