SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 7994

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
KAKI CHALCHALI M E MADRASSA AND 2 ORS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 806 / 2018



GAHC010028842018 2026:GAU-AS:4028 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/806/2018 KAKI CHALCHALI M E MADRASSA AND 2 ORS REP. BY IT'S HEAD MASTER CUM MEMBER SECRETARY OF THE SMC, P.O.

KAKI CHALCHALI, P.S. 1 NO. KAKI, DIST. HOJAI, ASSAM

2: TILAK CHANDRA BORA HEAD MASTER CUM SECRETARY OF KAKI CHALCHALI M.E. MADRASSA S/O. LT. LAMBU RAM BORA VILL. 3 NO. KAKI 1 NO. GAON P.O. THAISUPAR P.S. KAKI DIST. HOJAI ASSAM

3: MD. SHER ALI PRESIDENT OF SMC OF KAKI CHALCHALI M.E. MADRASSA S/O. LT. TABARAK ALI VILL. KAKI CHALCHALI MATIPAHAR P.O. KAKI CHALCHALI P.S. 1 NO. KAKI DIST. HOJAI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY., GOVT. OF ASSAM, SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.

ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY.

ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY.

4:THE ADDL. DY. COMMISSIONER IN CHARGE EDUCATION CUM CHAIRMAN DIST. LEVEL COMMITTEE NAGAON DIST. NAGAON ASSAM.

5:THE DIST. ELEMENTARY EDU. OFFICER NAGAON DIST. NAGAON ASSAM

6:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS NDC NAGAON ASSAM.

7:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER LANKA DIST. HOJAI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MAHMUD, MR M ALI,MR S HOQUE,MR S ISLAM,MR P K DAS,MS C KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, ELEM. EDU,SC, SEC. EDU.

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

ORDER

Date : 19-03-2026 Mr. M. U. Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing the matter at some length, fairly submits that he may be permitted to the authority in terms of Clause-7 of the Office Memorandum, dated

22.09.2016, a scheme for amalgamation and merger of different schools.

Mr. S. M. T. Chistie, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education is present.

Considering that an appeal would lie before the Government in terms of Clause-19 of the Office Memorandum, dated 03.08.2021, which is pari materia to Clause-7 of the Office Memorandum, dated 22.09.2016, the prayer for withdrawal is accepted.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with Government.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top