GAHC010048192026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/777/2026 KRISHNA KANTA SUTRADHAR S/O. SRI AMULYA SUTRADHAR, R/O. VILLAGE SAWKUCHI, MOUZA BELTOLA, P.S. BASISTHA HOUSE NO. 3, GUWAHATI - 781040 DISTRICT KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.

VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM,REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT,DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006

2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METRO GUWAHATI

3:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METRO GUWAHATI

4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE GUWAHATI DISTRICT KAMRUP M ASSAM

5:SMTI KANIKA PATHAK W/O. LATE DALIM PATHAK R/O. UZANBAZAR HOUSE NO. 28.

GUWAHATI - 781001 DISTRICT KAMRUP M ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K PURKAYASTHA, MR P K KALITA,H KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPT, GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR

ORDER

18.03.2026 Date :

Heard Mr. A. K. Purkayastha, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant.

2. The present interlocutory application has been instituted praying for correction of the name of the opposite party no.5 in the cause title of the connected writ petition being WP(C).615/2026.

3. In the cause title of the connected writ petition, the name of the respondent no.5 has been reflected as “Smti. Kanika Patar”. However, Mr. A. K. Purkayastha, submits that her actual name is “Smti. Kanika Pathak”. 4. Mr. B. J. Talukdar, learned Senior Counsel, appearing for the State Respondents, submits that he has no objection in correction of the name of the respondent no.5 as sought for by the learned counsel for the applicant.

5. In view of the above, the name of the respondent no.5 being inadvertently wrongly typed out in the cause title of the connected writ petition, this Court is of the considered view that the same would be permissible to be corrected by the applicant, herein.

6. Accordingly, the name of the respondent no.5, as appearing in the cause title of the connected writ petition be corrected as “Smti. Kanika Pathak”.

7. With the above observations and directions, the present interlocutory application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant