SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 9154

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
MD. JURAN ALI AHMED AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 2614 / 2024



GAHC010089622024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/2614/2024 MD. JURAN ALI AHMED AND ANR S/O- HAZI TAZUDDIN, R/O A K AZAD PATH, SHAHNAGAR, HATIGAON, GUWAHATI, DIST.- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN- 781038.

2: NURUL ISLAM S/O- LATE HAKIM ALI R/O- KAHILIPARA JANAKPUR NEAR JOURNALISH COLONY GUWAHATI DIST.- KAMRUP(M)

ASSAM PIN- 781019 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, FOREST AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, 2:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE ARANYA BHAWAN PANJABARI

3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.

4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.

5:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.

6:THE JOINT DIRECTOR TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.

7:THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI- 781001.

8:THE GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMDA)

REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BHANGAGARH ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S A AHMED, C S KAMTHONG,A. KHANAM,MR. F A

AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST, SC, HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS,GA,

ASSAM,SC, G M D A,SC, GMC

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

ORDER

Date : 02-04-2026 Mr. S.A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, the petitioners do not want to press the writ petition.

Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the State respondents is present.

In view of the above submission made by Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top