SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 9154

HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
MD. JURAN ALI AHMED AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) / 2614 / 2024



##PAGE1##

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010089622024

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/2614/2024

MD. JURAN ALI AHMED AND ANR S/O- HAZI TAZUDDIN, R/O A K AZAD PATH,

SHAHNAGAR, HATIGAON, GUWAHATI, DIST.- KAMRUP(M),

ASSAM, PIN- 781038.

2: NURUL ISLAM S/O- LATE HAKIM ALI

R/O- KAHILIPARA JANAKPUR

NEAR JOURNALISH COLONY

GUWAHATI DIST.- KAMRUP(M)

ASSAM PIN- 781019

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, FOREST AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006

2:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE ARANYA BHAWAN

PANJABARI GUWAHATI- 781037.

##PAGE2##

Page No.# 2/3

3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT DISPUR

GUWAHATI- 781006.

4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT

DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.

5:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM

MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT DISPUR

GUWAHATI- 781006.

6:THE JOINT DIRECTOR TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT

DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.

7:THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI- 781001.

8:THE GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMDA)

REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BHANGAGARH

ASSAM GUWAHATI- 781005

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S A AHMED, C S KAMTHONG,A. KHANAM,MR. F A AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST, SC, HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS,GA, ASSAM,SC, G M D A,SC, GMC

##PAGE3##

Page No.# 3/3

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

ORDER

Date : 02-04-2026

Mr. S.A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, the

petitioners do not want to press the writ petition.

Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the State respondents is present.

In view of the above submission made by Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top