##PAGE1##

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010029442026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/440/2026

SATYAJIT KHOUND SON OF MAKON KHOUND,VILLAGE- SONARI GAON,PO- RRL NEIST,DISTRICT- JORHAT, ASSAM 785001

2: SUDEEP KUMAR CHETIA SON OF SONAD KR. CHETIA VILLAGE- MANKATA ALI

JOYSAGAR P.O.- RUDRASAGAR

DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR ASSAM. PIN-785665

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER ANDSECRETARY TO THE GOVT.

OF ASSAM, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR,GUWAHATI-781006.

2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH DISPUR

GUWAHATI-781006.

3:THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION ASSAM SIXMILE

KHANAPARA GUWAHATI- 781026.

4:THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES ASSAM HENGRABARI

GUWAHATI-781036.

Page No.# 2/3

5:THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES (FW)

ASSAM HENGRABARI

GUWAHATI-781036

6:PARIMONI GOGOI DAUGHTER OF BHUPEN GOGOI

VILLAGE- PANITULA TEOK PO- HAHCHARA

PS- TEOK DIST.- JORHAT ASSAM

PIN- 78568

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K DAS, MRS P P BORAH

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HEALTH,

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

ORDER

31.03.2026 Date :

Heard Mr. P.K. Das, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. D. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, Health & Family Welfare Department for Opposite Party No. 1 to 5.

This is an application praying for correction of the name of the respondent No.6, which has been inadvertently shown as Parimita Gogoi in place of Parimoni Gogoi.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the petitioner has filed the connected writ petition challenging the appointment of some persons as Laboratory Technician pursuant to the advertisement dated 22.11.2014 including the respondent No.6 whose name has been inadvertently written as Parimita Gogoi in place of Parimoni Gogoi. Therefore, he may be allowed to correct the

name of the respondent No.6 in the cause title.

Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and also considering that the name of the respondent No.6 appears to have been inadvertently shown as “Parimita Gogoi” in

place of “Parimoni Gogoi”, I deem it appropriate to allow this application.

Page No.# 3/3

Accordingly, the learned counsel for the applicant is allowed to amend the Cause Title in respect of respondent No.6 by her correct name as “Parimoni Gogoi.”

I.A. stands allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant