2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 10256
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
BINOD SARMAH – Appellant
Versus
ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD – Respondent
WP(C) 1442 / 2025
##PAGE1##
Page No.# 1/9
GAHC010053242025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1442/2025
BINOD SARMAH
SON OF LATE BASUDEV SARMAH, RESIDENT OF QUARTER TYPE
III/01/GFI, MOTHER TERESSA ROAD, ASEB RESIDENTIAL COLONY,
NARENGI, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM PIN 781026.
VERSUS
ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, BIJULEE BHAWAN, PALTANBAZAR,
GUWAHATI -781001.
2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.
BIJULEE BHAWAN
PALTAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI-01
3:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HRA)
ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.
BIJULEE BHAWAN
PALTAN BAZAR
GUWAHATI-01
4:SMTI BABITA ADHIKARY
C/O DIPJYOTI DAS
UZAN BAZAAR
CHATRAKAR
NEAR HANUMAN MANDIR
MG ROAD
GUWAHATI-781001
##PAGE2##Page No.# 2/9
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS N MAHANTA, MR. D J DAS,N GAUTAM
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, APDCL, MS. M BORGOHAIN, (FOR R-4),MR. M DAS, (FOR
R-4),MR. P MAHANTA, (FOR R-4)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
ORDER
20.05.2026
Date :
Heard Mr. R. M. Deka, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also
heard Mr. I. Borthakur, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1, 2
and 3 and Mr. P. Mahanta, learned counsel for the impleaded respondent No.4.
2. The grievance in this petition was to the order dated 06.03.2025, whereby
the respondent authorities had cancelled the office order dated 17.01.2025
regarding the promotion of the petitioner to the rank of Headmaster.
3. The petitioner was appointed to the ASEB High School, Narengi, Guwahati on
21.09.1992, and the respondent No. 4 had been appointed to the same school
on 03.09.1992. It is an admitted position that the petitioner holds the B.Ed
degree, while the respondent No.4 does not hold the B.Ed degree.
4. By an order dated 17.01.2024, passed by the APDCL, the petitioner was
promoted to the rank of Headmaster in the usual payment and grade pay with
other allowances as may be admissible, as per the company’s rules and was
posted temporarily and until further order as Headmaster of the ASEB High
##PAGE3##Page No.# 3/9
School, Narengi, Guwahati, APDCL, with effect from the date of taking over
charge. By the order of the same date, but a different issue number, the
respondent No.4 was promoted to the rank of the Assistant Headmaster of the
same school on the same terms and conditions.
5. The petitioner accordingly joined as the Headmaster of the School on
01.02.2024. By an order dated 06.03.2025, the promotion of the petitioner to
the rank of Headmaster and the promotion of the respondent No.4 to the rank
of Assistant Headmaster were cancelled with immediate effect, with a stipulation
that no recovery would be made for the excess amount paid to them on account
of their promotion, with effect from their date of joining to the date of issuance
of this order.
6. On receipt of the aforesaid order, the present writ petition was filed, and by
an order dated 11.03.2025, this Court, while issuing notice, had stayed the
operation of the order dated 06.03.2025, insofar as it related to the present
petitioner till the disposal of the writ petition.
7. The respondent APDCL has filed an affidavit-in-opposition, stating that the
promotion of the petitioner was initially granted in view of the Assam Senior
Secondary Education (Government Schools) Service Rules, 2020, wherein it
was stated that the candidate for the Post of the Headmaster should be a
graduate with a B.Ed/BT Degree for any recognized University and possessing
10 years of teaching experience as a graduate teacher.
8. It has been stated that there are no codified service rules for teachers serving
##PAGE4##Page No.# 4/9
in the schools administered by the respondent APDCL. It has further been
stated that, as a matter of practice, in the past, promotions were being granted
on the basis of seniority, and such seniority was again based on the date of
joining of the incumbents to the post.
9. It is the stand of the respondent APDCL that the petitioner had been
promoted under the Rules of 2020, bypas