Back
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J
Tosheli – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of background facts and initial recruitment process. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. effect of the withdrawal of challenges to indigenous status. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. validity of selection lists pending legal challenge and consequential appointments. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER
Heard Mr. Limawapang, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner. Also heard Mr. I Imsong, Learned Addl. Advocate General appearing for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3 and Ms. Rovimeno Thou, Learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 4.
2. The Petitioner, in the present Writ Petition, has presented a challenge to the selection and appointment of the Respondent No. 4, against the post of Sweeper, in the establishment of the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Pughoboto, District- Zunheboto, on the ground that the Respondent No. 4 was not an indigenous inhabitant of the district, in question.
3. The facts in brief, requisite for adjudication of the issue, arising in the present Writ Petition, is noticed as under :
3.1. The Commissioner, Kohima, Nagaland, had issued an advertisement dated 17.01.2018, inviting applications for filing up of various Grade-III, as well as, Grade-IV posts, available i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
