GAUHATI HIGH COURT
CONSTABLE/DRIVER PANKAJ SAIKIA – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) 974 / 2026
##PAGE1##
Page No.# 1/5
GAHC010032912026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/974/2026
CONSTABLE/DRIVER PANKAJ SAIKIA
FORCE NO. 105132137, S/O- BAGADHAR SAIKIA, R/O VILL- BONAI KALIA
PANI GAON, P.O- AMTOL, P.S- BHAGAMUKH, DISTRICT- JORHAT, PIN-
785682, PRESENTLY POSTED AT COMPOSITE HOSPITAL, CRPF, AMERIGOG,
GUWAHATI, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW
DELHI- 110003
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OFFICE COMPLEX
NEW DELHI- 110001
3:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
(ESTABLISHMENT)
DIRECTORATE GENERAL
CENTRAL RESERVE POLCE FORCE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OFFICE COMPLEX
NEW DELHI- 110001
4:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL (MEDICAL)
CENTRAL RESERVE POLOCE FORCE
COMPOSITE HOSPITAL AMERIGOG
GUWAHATI
ASSAM. PIN- 78131
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D GOGOI, MS T WAPANGLA
##PAGE2##Page No.# 2/5
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. K GOGOI(C.G.C.)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
ORDER
18.05 .2026
Heard Mr. D. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.
Gogoi, learned CGC for the respondents.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order of transfer issued to
the petitioner on 05.01.2026. In terms of the said order, the petitioner was
transferred from the Composite Hospital Guwahati to the battalion being 243
BN, which is stated to be located at New Delhi. The said order reflects the
remark “SPECIAL”, indicating that the petitioner’s matter was a specially
considered. It is submitted that the petitioner's spouse is suffering from
“Papillary Carcinoma Thyroid (Cancer)”, since the year of 2017 and is currently
undergoing treatment.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the standing
order issued by the Director General of Central Reserve Police Force dated
27.09.2022 certain categories are specified, which are exempted from the
Summer Chain Transfers (SCT).
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner by referring to Clause No.7(i) of the
said standing order submits that on medical grounds, suffering from certain
illnesses which includes cancer, the transfer of the officers can be reconsidered
by the authorities. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is
##PAGE3##Page No.# 3/5
no dispute raised by the respondents that the petitioner's spouse is not suffering
from cancer/carcinoma. As a consequence thereof, the petitioner is entitled to
be considered and conferred the benefits under clause 7(i) of the said standing
order. However, the same not having been done, the petitioner filed a
representation before the authorities concerned, which stood rejected without
any reasons being cited by the respondent authorities. Under such
circumstances, the petitioner is before this Court.
5. The learned CGC for the respondents disputes the contentions raised by
the petitioner. The respondents have filed their affidavit contesting the claims
made by the petitioner drawing the averments made in paragraph No. 2 of the
said affidavit. It is submitted that the petitioner has already spent 10 years in
his home State during his entire service career of 15 years, and apart from this,
was also granted one year retention during the SCT 25 on medical grounds and
further, the petitioner has been transferred from Composite Hospital, CRPF,
Guwahati to 243 Battalion, New Delhi as a special case, as better medical
facilities are available in New Delhi. He therefore, submits that there is no
infirmity in the order of transfer.
6. The learned CGC further submits that the petitioner has not completed
6(six) years cooling-off period required for subsequent posting in the home
State and therefore, he was required to be transferred out, and as a special
case being considered by the authorities, the petitioner stood transferred to the
243 Battalion which is posted in New Delhi.
7. The petitioner reiterated his contentions by filing a rejoinder affidavit.
##PAGE4##Page No.# 4/5
8. The learned co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.