GAUHATI HIGH COURT
SHRI BISHAL PATOWARY – Appellant
Versus
THE GAUHATI UNIVERSITY AND 2 ORS – Respondent
WP(C) 1557 / 2026
##PAGE1##
Page No.# 1/6
GAHC010052142026
2026:GAU-AS:6839
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/1557/2026
SHRI BISHAL PATOWARY
S/O HIRANYA KUMAR PATOWARY, R/O TETELIA, P.O. MALIGAON
RAILWAY, HQ, PS- JALUKBARI, GUWAHATI, DIST. KAMRUP M, ASSAMPIN-
781011-
VERSUS
THE GAUHATI UNIVERSITY AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, JALUKBARI, P.O-GUWAHATI-14,
DISTRICT- KAMRUP, ASSAM.
2:THE REGISTRAR
GAUHATI UNIVERSITY
JALUKBARI
P.O- GUWAHATI-14
ASSAM
DISTRICT- KAMRUP
3:ADDITIONAL SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
GOVERNOR'S SECRETARIAT
LOK BHAWAN
GUWAHATI
PIN-78100
Advocate for the Petitioner : DR G J SHARMA, MS. K BHATTACHARYYA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, G U
##PAGE2##Page No.# 2/6
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
ORDER
18.05.2026
Date :
Hear Mr. G. J. Sharma, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Also heard Mr.
P. J. Phukan, the learned Standing Counsel for the Gauhati University.
2. In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case, this matter is
disposed of at the motion stage itself. By way of this application filed under
Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for
issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to
conduct the viva voce examination of the petitioner and to complete the entire
process of evaluation of his Ph.D. thesis within the time frame prescribed under
the University Grants Commission (Minimum Standards and Procedures for
Award of Ph.D. Degree) Regulations, 2022.
3. The case of the petitioner is that, the petitioner is a research scholar
pursuing his PhD at Gauhati University, 2020-2021 batch. Being admitted in
January 2021, the petitioner states that his PhD final registration was done on
18.04.2024 w.e.f 28.01.2021. Thereafter, the petitioner was directed to submit
his thesis after completion of 3 years of research work, but not later than 5
years. The petitioner states that he submitted his thesis on 13.02.2025 and it is
also stated that evaluation was also done in respect of the said thesis, pursuant
to which the only step that should be taken was the viva voce test for
completion of his PhD and award of degree. The Learned Counsel for the
petitioner, however, submits that till date, no viva voce test was conducted with
regard to the petitioner. The petitioner, however, received a Show Cause Notice
##PAGE3##Page No.# 3/6
from the Registrar of Gauhati University, by which it was stated that consequent
upon submission of recommendations by the Internal Complaint Committee,
Gauhati University, regarding a written complaint received, a Show Cause Notice
was issued to the petitioner directing him to file his reply within 10 days under
Rule 8(6) of the UGC (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal of Sexual
Harassment of Women Employees and Students in Higher Educational
Institutions) Regulations, 2015.
4. In pursuant to the said show cause notice, the petitioner had filed his reply
on 22.10.2025. Thereafter, the matter was placed in a meeting of the Executive
Council dated 11.11.2025 and the Executive Council had resolved that the
council after a detailed discussion by considering the report of allegations
against the petitioner, as well as the legal opinion by the standing counsel,
resolved that an FIR be lodged against the petitioner for a case of groping, and
that, thereafter, the FIR was lodged.
5. The petitioner also submits that he filed an appeal before the authority
concerned but the same is yet to be disposed of for reasons best known to the
appellate authority.
6. The petitioner, thereafter, states that on his representation being
submitted before the Hon’ble Chancellor, the Additional Secretary to the
Government of Assam, Governor's Secretariat, Lok Bhavan, by a communication
to the Registrar of Gauhati University, the opinion of the Hon’ble Governor cum
Chancellor of Gauhati University was conveyed to the effect that conduction of
viva voce of the petitioner can't be withheld on the pretext of some disciplinary
proc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.