SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 10781

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
SMTI NILIMA MAZUMDAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS – Respondent
WP(C) 2533 / 2026



##PAGE1##

Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010092772026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/2533/2026

SMTI NILIMA MAZUMDAR

D/O NIRODH CHANDRA MAZUMDAR, I/C PRINCIPAL, MAHUR HIGHER

SECONDARY SCHOOL, R/O- PRINCIPALS QUARTER, MAHUR H.S SCHOOL,

DIST.- DIMA HASAO, ASSAM, PIN- 788830

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS

REPRESENTED THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE

GOVT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION SECONDARY

EDUCATION, DISPUR, GHY, ASSAM, PIN 781006

2:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION

ASSAM

KAHILIPARA

GHY

ASSAM

PIN 781019

3:THE NORTH CACHAR HILLS AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

DIMA HASAO

ASSAM

4:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (HILLS)

ASSAM

HAFLONG

DIMA HASAO

ASSAM

5:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS

DIMA HASAO DISTRICT CIRCLE

HAFLONG

DIMA HASAO

##PAGE2##

Page No.# 2/3

ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S SUTRADHAR, MR. B PURKAYASTHA,MR. J P BARUAH

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU., SC, DIMA HASAO

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN

ORDER

Date : 18-05-2026

Heard Mr. B Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioner.

By this application, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the

petitioner has prayed to consider her application to the post of Principal, which

according to the later advertisement made in the year 2024, she became

ineligible having crossed the age of 57 years for appointment to the said post. It

is the case of the petitioner that an advertisement was issued by the respondent

authorities for promotion to the vacant post of Principal of Mahur Higher

Secondary School, Dima Hasao, which according to the learned counsel for the

petitioner was an incorrect advertisement since the appointment to the post of

Principal of the Higher Secondary School is by way of direct recruitment.

Having realized their mistake, the respondent authorities in the Dima

Hasao issued another advertisement in the year 2024 for direct recruitment to

the post of Principal of the said Higher Secondary School, under which the

petitioner became ineligible in pursuance to the advertisement issued later.

Aggrieved, the petitioner has filed this writ petition to consider her to the

said post of Principal of the Higher Secondary School by condoning her age or

by issuing necessary corrigendum.

Issue notice of motion, returnable by 3 (three) weeks.

##PAGE3##

Page No.# 3/3

Mr. U Sharma, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education

Department accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 & 2, Mr. V Khesoh,

learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. RM Das, learned counsel accepts

notice on behalf of respondent No. 3 while Mr. C Sharma, learned counsel

accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 4 & 5. Notice is therefore,

complete.

Petitioner to serve requisite extra copies of the writ petition to the

counsels appearing for the respondents today within 2 (two) days.

List this matter on 08.06.2026.

The counsels appearing for the respondents shall file their respective

affidavits by the next date.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top