GAUHATI HIGH COURT
ARMC 6000036Y COMMANDANT SHYAM SUNDAR SHAH – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. – Respondent
WP(C) 2559 / 2026
##PAGE1##
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010093582026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2559/2026
ARMC 6000036Y COMMANDANT SHYAM SUNDAR SHAH
S/O SRI BISHNU PRASAD SHAH PRESENTLY SERVING AT HEAD QUARTER
INSPECTOR GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES (EAST) C/O 99APO
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY THE GOVT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF
HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI
2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL
ASSAM RIFLES
DIRECTORATE GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES
SHILLONG
MEGHALAYA
PIN-793011
3:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
ASSAM RIFLES (EAST) HEADQUARTER IGAR (EAST) SRIKONA
DIST CACHAR ASSAM C/O 99APO
4:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL
DIRECTOR (MEDICAL)
HEAD QUARTER DIRECTORATE GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES
SHILLONG
MEGHALAY
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR V KUMAR, MS M TIWARI,MR B PATHAK
Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.,
##PAGE2##Page No.# 2/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
ORDER
18.05.2026
Heard Mr. B Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner.
The petitioner is employed as a Doctor in the Assam Rifles and had
suffered ankle injury in the right ankle which required implant and as a
consequence thereof, he was not considered medically suitable for posting in
hilly terrain. On the basis of the opinion of the medical board, the petitioner was
posted at Silchar and he is presently serving there. During his posting at Silchar,
the petitioner was sought to be transferred by order dated 05.08.2024, which
was challenged by filing a writ petition, being WP(C) No. 4343/2024. By order
dated 30.08.2024, the transfer order was stayed, and the matter is still pending.
Being thus situated, the Assam Rifles Authorities without putting the petitioner
to notice passed an order invalidating the earlier Medical Board’s order and
reconsidered the case of the petitioner. The Medical Board thereafter passed a
fresh opinion by order dated 01.04.2026. According to the writ petitioner
although his disability has been identified and he is shown to have been
suffering from 19.02% disability, however, there is recommendation that his
posting should be in non-hilly terrain. Learned counsel for the petitioner,
##PAGE3##Page No.# 3/3
therefore, submits that in view of the cancellation of the earlier medical board
opinion and there being no recommendation that the petitioner should not be
posted in any hilly terrain, the petitioner may now be posted at any other place
ignoring his disability. Being aggrieved, he has filed this writ petition. It is also
submitted that the earlier medical opinion having been cancelled, the order
dated 30.08.2024 passed in the earlier writ petition being WP(C) No. 4343/2024
which is pending will now be rendered as infructuous.
Ms. B Sarma, learned CGC prays for time to complete her instructions in
this regard.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties,
let Notice be issued, returnable by 19.06.2026.
Since Ms. B Sarma, learned CGC appears and accepts notice on behalf of
all the respondents, notices are waived. However, extra copies be furnished to
her within 1 (one) week from today.
The respondents authority will not proceed with the transfer of the
petitioner to any hill terrain station during the pendency of the writ petition.
List the matter again on 19.06.2026.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.