2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 11566
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
JAGDISH SAHU AND 17 ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. – Respondent
WP(C) 2453 / 2026
##PAGE1##
Page No.# 1/5
GAHC010088142026
2026:GAU-AS:6889
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2453/2026
JAGDISH SAHU AND 17 ORS.
S/O. LT. GOLAPCHAN TELI
2: SRI AMRITLAL SAHU
S/O. LT. GOLAPCHAN TELI
3: SRI CHANDRA SAHU
S/O. LT. GOLAPCHAN TELI
4: SRI DURGA SAHU
S/O. LT. GOLAPCHAN TELI
5: SRI GOLAP CHANDRA SAHU @ GOPAL CHANDRA SAHU
S/O. LT. RAJBIHARI SAHU
6: SMTI. BIDYABATI SAHU
W/O. LT. KISHAN PRASAD SAHU
7: SRI PRANAY SAHU
S/O. LT. KISHAN PRASAD SAHU
8: SMTI. KABITA SAHU
D/O. LT. KISHAN PRASAD SAHU
9: SMTI. DOLY SAHU
D/O. LT. KISHAN PRASAD SAHU
10: SMTI ROSY SAHU
D/O. LT. KISHAN PRASAD SAHU
11: SMTI. KUSUM SAHU
W/O. LT. BIJOY SAHU
12: SRI ANUP SAHU
##PAGE2##Page No.# 2/5
S/O. LT. BIJOY SAHU
13: SRI. PADHESHYAM SAHU
S/O. LT. RAJABIHARI SAHU
14: SMTI. MINA SAHU
W/O. LT. RABIN SAHU
15: SRI. ASISH SAHU
S/O. LT. RABIN SAHU
16: SRI PRABIN SAHU
S/O. LT. SIVCHARAN SAHU
17: SRI KESARI @ KISHOR SAHU
S/O. LT. SIVCHARAN SAHU
18: SRI. NANDA SAHU
S/O. LT. SIVCHARAN SAHU
ALL ARE PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILL.- KUKURJAN GAON
MOUZA- GOHPUR
P/O. AND P/S. GOPHUR
DIST. BISWANATH
ASSAM
PIN-78417
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.
REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006
2:THE CO-DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
BISWANATH
ASSAM
PIN-784176
3:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
BISWANATH
DIST. BISWANATH
ASSAM
PIN-784176
4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER
GOHPUR REVENUE CIRCLE
GOHPUR-784168
5:SRI MINTU GOGOI
##PAGE3##Page No.# 3/5
S/O. LT. GOPAL GOGOI
6:SRI BALIN GOGOI
S/O. LT. GOPAL GOGOI
7:SRI DILIP GOGOI
S/O. LT. GOPAL GOGOI
8:SRI BABUL GOGOI
S/O. LT. KANADHAR GOGOI
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF KUKURJAN GAON
P/O. AND P/S. GOHPUR
BISWANATH
ASSAM
PIN-78417
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A BISWAS, MR P K BASU,MR R KALITA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
19.05.2026
Heard Mr. A. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. A. Bhattacharya, learned
Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 1; and Mr. J. Handique,
learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4.
2. The petitioners have claimed that they are landowners of various parcels of land,
described in Paragraph 2.1 of the writ petition and in the Schedule of the plaint of Title Suit
no. 11/2025 presently pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Gohpur, measuring
about 60 Bighas 0 Katha and 11 Lessas.
3. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondent no. 4 without following due
procedure of serving prior notices to the petitioners, had embarked on a demarcation exercise
in collusion with the respondent nos. 5, 6, 7 & 8, who are private persons. As the petitioners
##PAGE4##Page No.# 4/5
are not aware as how the demarcation exercise stood initiated in spite of pendency of Title
Suit no. 11/2025, they sought to submit an application each to the respondent no. 3 and the
respondent no. 4 on 19.03.2024 seeking copies of [i] the application filed by the private
respondents herein seeking demarcation of the Schedule of land, mentioned therein, [ii] the
copies of notices issued for demarcation, if any, and [iii] the Order passed by the respondent
no. 4 for demarcation in respect of the said Schedule of land. The petitioners have canvassed
that as the respondent no. 4 did not acknowledge the receipt of the application in his office,
the petitioners were compelled to send the said application by post and the same was duly
delivered at the office of the respondent no. 4 on 20.03.2026. In so far as the application
submitted before the respondent no. 3 is concerned, the office of the respondent no. 3 had
duly received the same and also acknowledged the receipt of the application under seal and
signature on 19.03.2026. Yet, the said two respondent authorities have not provided the
information / documents as sought for by the petitioners through the said applications.
4. When the writ petition was moved on 13.05.2026, Mr. Handique, learned State Counsel
submitted that he would obt