SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 11599

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
M/S SATISH PRASAD AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR – Respondent


GAHC010179152025

2026:GAU-AS:6615 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/4899/2025 M/S SATISH PRASAD AND ANR REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR SATISH PRASAD HAVING OFFICE AT VISHWANATH APARTMENT, NEAR OJHA MARKET, DEVI MANDAP ROAD, HESAL, RANCHI, JHARKHAND-834005

2: SATISH PRASAD PROPRIETOR OF M/S SATISH PRASAD SON OF LATE GANG PRASAD HAVING PLACE OF BUSINESS AT VISHWANATH APARTMENT NEAR OJHA MARKET DEVI MANDAP ROAD HESAL RANCHI JHARKHAND-83400 VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAILWAY BOARD, RAILWAY BHAWAN, NEW DELHI

2:THE GENERAL MANAGER N.F. RAILWAY HAVING OFFICE AT MALIGAON GUWAHATI ASSAM-78101 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D. Rathi, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K. Gogoi, CGC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

ORDER

Date : 13.05.2026 Heard Mr. D. Rathi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and Mr. K. Gogoi, the learned CGC, appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

2. The Petitioners herein are aggrieved by the imposition of penal demurrage charges to the tune of Rs.14,26,856/- which the Petitioners had to pay and further terminal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top