SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 11898

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Nelson Sailo, J
Smt. Lalrinsangi – Appellant
Versus
Sh. P.C. Lalmalsawma – Respondent
RFA/35/2025 | I.A.(Civil)/142/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Lalfakawma
For the Respondents:

The court is examining the validity of a Heirship Certificate obtained by one sibling without the knowledge of another, specifically addressing the adequacy of notice via newspaper publication.

Headnote:The appellant has challenged an order dated 20.07.2018 passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge – III regarding the issuance of Heirship Certificate No. 868/2018. The facts indicate that the appellant and respondent are siblings; the appellant claims to have cared for their mother until her death on 20.10.2007, while the respondent subsequently obtained the heirship certificate. The primary issue is whether the heirship certificate was obtained without the appellant's knowledge, despite the requirement for newspaper publication. The court is examining the contention that the appellant was unaware of the application process. Notice is issued to the respondent, returnable in three weeks, with permission for dasti service.

Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/142/2025

Smt. Lalrinsangi

D/o Lalsanga (L)

R/o House No. 81

Dawrpui Vengthar

Aizawl

Mizoram

VERSUS

Sh. P.C. Lalmalsawma

S/o Lalsanga (L)

R/o Dawrpui Vengthar

Aizawl

Mizoram

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalfakawma

Advocate for the Respondent :

ORDER

Heard Mr. T. Lalzekima, learned counsel for the appellant, who submits that by filing this appeal, the appellant has challenged the order dated 20.07.2018 passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge – III in Heirship Certificate No. 868/2018 and also the Heirship Certificate issued to the respondent in terms of the order.

The learned counsel submits that the appellant and the respondent are siblings and their mother expired on 20.10.2007. He submits that the appellant was living with their mother at the time of her death and looking after her, whereas the respondent was settled in a different locality with his family. After the death of their mother, the respondent moved into the main house where the appellant was living with their mother and obtained the Heirship Certificate.

The learned counsel submits that although newspaper publication was done prior to the issuance of the Heirship Certificate but the appellant was not in the knowledge of such application.

Considering the above, let notice be issued returnable by 3 (three) weeks. The appellant to take steps for service of notice upon the sole respondent.

The appellant is permitted to serve notice upon the respondent by way of dasti through the registry of this Court within ten (10) days from today.

The appellant shall then file an affidavit as proof of service.

List the matter again after 3 (three) weeks.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top