SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 13114

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Nelson Sailo, J
NARAYAN THAKURIA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS – Respondent
WP(C)/157/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: T H Hazarika, A Rashid, M Chetia
For the Respondents: SC, Elem. Edu, SC, Finance

An employee whose suspension period has been regularized following acquittal in a criminal case and the dropping of departmental proceedings is entitled to the payment of arrear salaries for the period of suspension.

Headnote:The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher, was placed under suspension on 20.10.2009 due to involvement in a criminal case. Following his reinstatement on 08.06.2015 and subsequent acquittal by the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1 Class, Boko, on 18.02.2021, the Director of Elementary Education, Assam, regularized the suspension period and dropped the departmental proceedings on 22.02.2022. The primary issue is the non-payment of arrear salary from October 2009 to January 2022, despite the issuance of certificates by the Block Elementary Education Officer and the Treasury Officer confirming the receivable amount. The court observed that since the suspension period has been regularized, the claim for arrears is valid. The court directed the respondent authorities to verify the amount receivable by the petitioner as arrear salary and pay the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order. The writ petition stands disposed of.

Table of Content
1. the petitioner's suspension was regularized following acquittal in a criminal case, leading to a claim for unpaid arrear salaries. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. the court mandates the verification and payment of regularized suspension arrears within a specified timeframe. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)

O R D E R

Heard Mr. M. Chetia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Borah, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education Department appearing for the respondents. Having regard to the nature of grievance projected by the petitioner, the writ petition is taken up for disposal at this stage.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he was appointed as an Assistant Teacher at Nisinpur Primary School under Boko Block in the district of Kamrup (Rural), Assam on 18.01.1993. On account of certain allegations, the petitioner was placed under suspension vide order dated 20.10.2009. Be it stated herein that the petitioner was placed under suspension on account of his involvement in a criminal case and for which he was arrested. Subsequently, the petitioner was reinstated back into service vide order dated 08.06.2015 and he was also acquitted from the charges in the criminal case by the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1 Class, Boko, vide judgment dated 18.02.2021 passed in G.R Case No.6976/2009. The Director of Elementary Education, Assam thereafter vide order dated 22.02.2022, in view of the acquittal of the petitioner in the criminal case, regularized the period of his suspension and also dropped the departmental proceeding against him.

3. The petitioner contends that he has not received his salary from the month of October, 2009 to the month of January, 2022 and the arrear amount comes to Rs.24,26,093/-, which was duly served by the Block Elementary Education Officer, Boko by issuing a certificate to that effect. The said certificate has also been countersigned by the Treasury Officer, Kamrup District Treasury, Amingaon, Guwahati. It is however, seen that a similar certificate has been issued by the same Block Elementary Education Officer, Boko wherein the amount receivable by the petitioner as arrear is Rs.24,25,055/-. Be that as it may, the fact that the petitioner has been reinstated from his suspension and that his suspension period has been regularized cannot be in dispute. The writ petition was filed by the petitioner on 09.01.2024, but till date there is no response from the respondent authorities by filing counter affidavit.

4. Such being the position, this Court finds that instead of keeping the matter pending before this Court, the same should be disposed of by directing the respondent authorities to verify the amount receivable by the petitioner as arrear salary and thereafter, pay him the same without further delay.

5. Such an exercise should be done by all the respondents concerned within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

6. It is ordered accordingly.

7. The writ petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top