GAUHATI HIGH COURT
NAVNEET SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS – Respondent
WA 125 / 2026
##PAGE1##
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010080722026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WA/125/2026
NAVNEET SHARMA
S/O SRI RAMESWAR SHARMA, R/O SONAI BAZAR, P.O. SONAI, DIST.
CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN 788119
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. EXCISE DEPTT. TO
THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 781006, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM.
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
CACHAR
SILCHAR
ASSAM
PIN 788001
3:ADDL. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
CACHAR I/C EXCISE
SILCHAR
ASSAM
PIN 788001
4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF EXCISE
CACHAR
SILCHAR
ASSAM
PIN 788001
5:THE SELECTION COMMITEE OF IMFL OFF SHOP LICENSE SONAI
##PAGE2##Page No.# 2/3
OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL SECY.
EXCISE DEPTT.
P.O. ASSAM
SACHIVALAYA
DISPUR
GUWAHATI 781006
DIST. KAMRUP (M)
6:SUDIPTO SEKHAR PAUL
S/O DIPON KUMAR PAUL
R/O N.S. AVENUE
BHUBAN SARANI RANGIRKHARI
DIST. CACHAR
SILCHAR 788005
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K N CHOUDHURY, MR. TANUZ KASHYAP,N
GAUTAM,MR. D J DAS,MR. R M DEKA
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, FOR CAVEATOR,MR B DEORI,MR G
BHARADWAJ,SC, EXCISE DEPTT.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
ORDER
30.04.2026
(S.K. Medhi, J)
Heard Shri K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri R.M.
Deka, learned counsel for the appellant, who has preferred this appeal against
the judgment and order dated 31.03.2026 passed in WP(C)/5702/2022. By the
said judgment, the writ petition instituted by the present respondent no. 6 has
been allowed and the IMFL “OFF” license issued to the present appellant has
been interfered with.
##PAGE3##Page No.# 3/3
The learned Senior Counsel has submitted that the view taken by the
learned Single Judge on the point of the role of the Guardian Minister may not
be a correct view.
Let notice be issued, returnable on 29.05.2026.
Shri R.R. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel, Excise Department accepts
notice on behalf of the respondent nos. the 1, 4 and 5, Ms. S. Sarma, learned
State Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 and 3 and Shri
A. Khanikar, learned counsel for the caveator accepts notice on behalf of the
respondent no. 6.
Shri Choudhury, the learned Senior Counsel prays for an interim order.
Considering the facts and circumstances, it is provided that status quo as
on today be maintained till the returnable date.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.