SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 14285

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)


Case No. : WP(C)/1285/2026


MAHFUZ AHMED LASKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS

TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE

GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR,

GUWAHATI-781006.

2:THE COMMISSIONER ANDSECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM

PERSONNEL B DEPARTMENT

DISPUR GUWAHATI-06

3:THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM

PERSONNEL B DEPARTMENT

DISPUR GUWAHATI-06.

4:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE

CACHAR

REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

CACHAR

P.O- SILCHAR

DIST. CACHAR

ASSAM

PIN-788001

5:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER

CACHAR

SILCHAR

P.O- SILCHAR

DIST. CACHAR

ASSAM

PIN- 788001


Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F A LASKAR, MR A MALEK

Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, GA, ASSAM


BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR


Date : 28-04-2026

ORDER

Heard Mr. F.A. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. P. Das, learned standing counsel, Secondary Education, Assam appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 & 5 and Ms. S. Konwar, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam appearing for the respondent Nos. 2 to 4.

2. The petitioner in the present proceeding has presented a challenge to a resolution adopted by the jurisdictional District Level Committee (DLC) in its meeting held on 16-08-2025, towards rejecting the claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds, on the ground that the application as submitted by the petitioner in this connection, had lost its force in terms of the scheme in place.

3. The father of the petitioner late Motiur Rahman Laskar while working as Chowkidar of Dudpur M.E. Madrassa, Silchar in the district of Cachar had died-in-harness on 02-02-2010. Pursuant to the death of the father of the petitioner, he had submitted an application for appointment on compassionate grounds on 07-07-2014. The said application was, thereafter, forwarded to the District Elementary Education Officer, Cachar on 07-07-2014. The District Level Committee (DLC), Cachar in its meeting held on 27-10-2017 considered the application submitted by the petitioner and the same was rejected due to want of vacancies. The said application being rejected, the petitioner had approached this Court by way of instituting a writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 5711/2022 challenging the resolution of the jurisdictional DLC. A Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 21-10-2022, had disposed of the said writ petition with a direction upon the respondent authorities to place the case of the petitioner before the jurisdictional DLC, for consideration as per Clause-15 of the Office Memorandum dated 01-06-2015. The application submitted by the petitioner was considered by the jurisdictional DLC in its meeting held on 30-01-2024, however, the application of the petitioner came to be rejected on the ground that there was no vacant post available within the 5% quota mandated for appointment on compassionate grounds. It is to be noted that the jurisdictional DLC had considered the case of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds in the parent office as well as in other offices.

4. The petitioner being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for appointment on compassionate grounds again approached this Court by way of instituting a writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 457/2025. In the said application an office memorandum dated 18-09-2024, by which it was informed that the cases for appointment on compassionate grounds of family members of Government servants who had died-in-harness prior to 31-03-2017, would not be entertained by the Administrative Department/ Authority for any reason whatsoever nor be placed before the constituted committee for consideration, was also assailed. A Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03-04-2025 proceeded to dispose of the said writ petition, along with other analogous matters, by directing that the applications of the petitioners, therein, shall be considered by the constituted committee, by taking into consideration various guidelines issued prior to 01-04-2017, for consideration of cases of applicants, for appointment on compassionate grounds. Accordingly, the application submitted by the petitioner was again placed before the jurisdictional DLC in its meeting held on 16-08-2025. The Committee upon considering the applications submitted by the petitioner proceeded to reject the same by holding that the same had spent its force as per Principle No. 10 of the OM dated 01-06-2015.

Being aggrieved, the petitioner has instituted the present writ petition.

5. Mr. F.A. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner by reiterating the facts noticed, hereinabove, has submitted that the application submitted by the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds was admittedly not considered by the jurisdictional DLC by foll

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top