SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 14578

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)


GAHC010066352026

2026:GAU-AS:5745


Case No. : WP(C)/2020/2026


BIJOY KRISHNA DEY AND ANR

SON OF LATE RAKHAL CHANDRA DEY

RESIDENT OF DHING BAGAN, P.O. AND P.S. DHING, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN-781006.

2:THE DRUGS CONTROLLER (I/C)

LICENSING AND CONTROLLING AUTHORITY

HENGRABARI

GUWAHATI-36.

3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

NAGAON

ASSAM

P.O.AND P.S. NAGAON

DIST. NAGAON

ASSAM

PIN-782006.

4:THE INSPECTOR OF DRUGS

OFFICE OF THE DRUGS CONTROL ADMINISTRATION

DIST. NAGAON

ASSAM

PIN-781006


Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J SAIKIA, SR. ADV, MS. P BORAH,MS M NIROLA,MR. K BORUAH

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, HEALTH


BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI


Date : 27.04.2026

ORDER

Heard Mr. P. J. Saikia, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. K. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D. Upamanyu, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Health Department (respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4).

2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the impugned order dated 04.02.2026 issued by respondent No. 2, whereby the Drug License Nos. NNG/5233 and NNG/5234 issued to the petitioner were suspended.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner, being a registered pharmacy, was running the same in accordance with the provisions of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules of 1945”), as per the registration granted thereunder. On a complaint filed by one Sahidul Islam, a police case was registered as Dhing P.S. Case No. 292/2025 under Section 105 of the BNS, pursuant to which respondent No. 2 issued notice to the petitioner.

4. Thereafter, pursuant to the aforesaid incident, the petitioner also received a notice dated 19.01.2026 issued by respondent No. 2, directing the petitioner to show cause as to why necessary action should not be taken against them. Subsequently, by the impugned order dated 04.02.2026, respondent No. 2 suspended the drug license of the petitioner till compliance with the defects.

5. The petitioner accordingly filed a statutory appeal before respondent No. 1 on 06.03.2026; however, the said appeal has not yet been considered or disposed of. Accordingly, the present writ petition has been filed.

6. Mr. P. J. Saikia, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, submits that at the outset, since the statutory appeal is still pending, a direction may be issued for its consideration and disposal within a reasonable, fixed period of time.

7. Mr. D. Upamanyu, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Health Department, does not oppose the said prayer.

8. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties and noting that an appeal under Rule 66(2) of the Rules of 1945 is pending against the impugned order dated 04.02.2026, this Court is of the considered view that the writ petition can be disposed of, in the interest of justice, by directing the appellate authority to consider and dispose of the appeal in accordance with law within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

9. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top