Back
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Devashis Baruah, J
Samsul Hoque – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and procedural history of the revenue disputes. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding the scope of the board of revenue's order. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. importance of natural justice and notice in supervisory proceedings. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. review jurisdictions are limited to the original subject matter. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
Heard Mr. M. Hussain, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners in all the writ petitions. Mr. J. Handique, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Respondent No.1; Ms. U. Das, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 and Mr. J. Roy, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. Sarmah, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Respondent Nos.7 to 12 in all the writ petitions.
2. The four writ petitions which are presently taken up for disposal by this common judgment and order assail the order dated 07.01.2025 passed by the learned Assam Board of Revenue in Case No.5RA(DBR)(RVW)/2022.
3. The Petitioners in WP(C) No.344/2025 and WP(C) No.443/2025 are the Khatian
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
