SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 15802

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Rajesh Mazumdar, J
Rahul Das – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. – Respondent
WP(C)/1373/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: J Patowary
For the Respondents: N Deka, R Karim, B Phukan, A R Barooah, M Gogoi

An employer is bound by the specific age relaxation criteria set out in their own recruitment advertisement; where an advertisement allows for cumulative age relaxation—such as category-based relaxation combined with technical certificate-based relaxation—the denial of such cumulative benefits constitutes an arbitrary rejection of candidature.

Headnote:(A) Apprentices Act, 1961 - Recruitment Advertisement - Age relaxation - Rejection of candidature - Petitioner was denied additional age relaxation of one year under a specific clause of the advertisement meant for candidates possessing Boiler Competency Certificate, despite being entitled to it over and above the category-based relaxation - Respondents admitted failure to correctly apply recruitment criteria resulting in erroneous rejection of candidature - Court held that candidates are entitled to cumulative benefits of age relaxation where terms of the advertisement allow for both category-specific and post-specific relaxations. (Paras 25, 28, 30)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought appointment as a Junior Engineering Assistant-IV (Power and Utility) under the respondent Corporation. He was rejected for being over-aged despite qualifying for OBC (Non-Creamy Layer) age relaxation, as the respondent failed to grant an additional one-year age relaxation provided in the advertisement for candidates holding a Boiler Competency Certificate. The respondent later admitted the error in their internal records.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the petitioner's claim, finding that the respondent's refusal to grant the additional age relaxation was erroneous based on the advertisement's terms. The court directed the respondent to allow the petitioner to participate in the remaining stages of the selection process.

Issues: Whether the respondent Corporation correctly refused the additional one-year age relaxation for candidates with a Boiler Competency Certificate, and whether the rejection of the petitioner was arbitrary.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an advertisement provides for cumulative age relaxation under different categories (such as reservation status and specific technical certifications), strict adherence to these terms is mandatory, and administrative errors resulting in the denial of such benefits must be rectified by permitting the affected candidate to participate in the selection process.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. overview of recruitment criteria, apprenticeship certificates, and the dispute over age eligibility. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. arguments concerning cumulative age relaxation for apprenticeship and statutory quotas. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
3. court's directive to rectify recruitment errors and permit candidate participation. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)

JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL)

Heard Mr. J. Patowary, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. I. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. T. Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the IOCL and Mr. B. Phukan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5.

2. The petitioner in this writ petition is a graduate from Gauhati University, having obtained his degree of Bachelor of Science with a major in Physics in the year 2014. The petitioner also belongs to the class of candidates identified as Other Backward Classes. The writ petition contains a format of certificate supplied by the respondent IOCL to the candidates where the petitioner has been certified to belong to the Backward Class under the relevant notifications of the Government of India, and it has also been certified that he does not belong to the persons or sections included in the creamy layer mentioned in the relevant schedule to the Government of India, DOPT OM dated 08.09.1993. The aforesaid format had been issued by the competent authority on the basis of a certificate which was earlier issued to the petitioner. The petitioner, after having attained his educational qualifications, had undergone a training course. On successful completion of the training, he was awarded a “National Apprenticeship Certificate” issued by the Directorate General of Training, Government of India, certifying that the petitioner had undergone appropriate training from 12.05.2017 to 11.05.2019 in the designated trade of Boiler Attendant. Another certificate had been issued to the petitioner by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited certifying that the petitioner had completed the 24 months Apprenticeship Training as a Trade Apprentice (Boiler Attendant) under the Apprenticeship Act.

3. The Indian Oil Corporation Limited had floated an advertisement on 25.09.2021 calling for applications, amongst others, for the post of Junior Engineering Assistant - IV (Power and Utility), post code 202. The number of posts shown to be available in IOCL, Guwahati, was 3, out of which two would be available for candidates belonging to the unreserved category, whereas one post was shown to be reserved for candidates belonging to the OBC (Non-Creamy Layer) category. The qualification and experience criteria, given at clause B of the aforesaid advertisement with regard to the post of Junior Engineering Assistant - IV (P & U), required the candidate to possess a three-year's diploma in mechanical or electrical engineering from a recognized institute of the University and Boiler Competency Certificate, with a proviso that in case of non-availability of sufficient number of candidates meeting the prescribed parameters, candidates possessing other qualifications noted in the advertisement itself, including BSc (PCM) with apprenticeship training in boiler trade would also be considered for the said post.

4. Insofar as the criteria of experience for the aforesaid post are concerned, the advertisement noted that, for candidates possessing Diploma/Metric with ITI (Fitter) and holding a Boiler Competency Certificate or a BSc with boiler apprenticeship, no further experience would be required. The requirements for candidates possessing a diploma were also laid down in the advertisement itself. However, since the same does not concern the issue related to this writ petition, the same are not referred to in this order. The advertisement had also laid down the conditions of the age limit and the relaxation therein for candidates belonging to the SC/ST/OB

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top