GAUHATI HIGH COURT
YOGRAJ PATHAK ALIAS MR YUBRAJ PATHAK – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
AB 752 / 2026
##PAGE1##
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010069712026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/752/2026
YOGRAJ PATHAK ALIAS MR YUBRAJ PATHAK
S/O PASUPATI NATH PATHAK, R/O VILL KHERONI, PO AND PS KHERONI,
DIST WEST KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN 782448
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : TAWHID LASKAR, ASHRAFUL BORBHUYAN,MR. D K
AGARWALA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
ORDER
20.04.2026
Heard Mr. T. Laskar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard the
learned APP.
This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS praying for pre-arrest bail
##PAGE2##Page No.# 2/3
in connection with Kheroni PS Case No. 54/2025 under Sections 61(2)
(b)/196(1)/197/353(1)(b)/353(1)(c)/353(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 r/w Sections 3(1)
(r)/3(1)(5)/3(1)(4) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioners are
eager to appear before the Investigating Authority but apprehend arrest.
The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that even as per the
FIR, the allegations are only of raising slogans during a protest rally. Accordingly, the
petitioners are directed to appear before the Investigating Officer of the case on or
before 24.04.2026 to participate in the investigation and have their statements
recorded.
The updated Case Diary will be produced before this Court on 29.04.2026, since
the Case Diary has also been called for in AB No. 269/2026, which is fixed on
29.4.2026.
It is provided that in the meantime, if the petitioner is arrested, he shall be
released on bail on executing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety of the like
amount subject to the following conditions:-
(i) that the petitioner shall fully co-operate with the investigation of the case
and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required in connection
##PAGE3##Page No.# 3/3
with the investigation of the aforesaid P.S. case; and
(ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement,
threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to
dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.
List on 29.04.2026.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.