SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 16610

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
DURLAV BARUAH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT & ORDER (CAV)

Heard Ms. N. Saikia, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Borthakur, learned Counsel for the respondent No.4 and Ms. R. Baruah, learned Standing Counsel for Secondary Education.

2. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner, being aggrieved by her non-selection and by the selection of the respondent No. 5 as the Principal of Kolaigaon Higher Secondary School pursuant to a selection process initiated by an advertisement dated 12.09.2019.

3. The petitioner was initially appointed as a subject teacher in the Kabirali Higher Secondary School by an order dated 08.05.1996, and thereafter, he was transferred to the Kolaigaon H.S. School against a vacancy which had arisen due to the expiry of a subject teacher. A selection process for the post of Principal in the School had been initiated in the year 2016, and a certain Dibakar Baishya was appointed, by order dated 13.06.2017, as the Principal of the School. The respondent No.5 herein was placed at Sl. No.1 on the waiting list in the aforesaid selection. Although Sri Dibakar Baishya was appointed by order dated 13.06.2017, h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top