SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 16639

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Devashis Baruah, J
Imtinaro – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sentiyanger
For the Respondents: A. Jungli

Table of Content
1. basis of claim for employment based on land donation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. verification of land ownership and prior claims. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. statutory framework for landowner appointment claims. (Para 9 , 10)
4. court directions for administrative procedural finalization. (Para 11)

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

Heard Mr. Sentiyanger, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. Mr. A. Jungli, the learned Government Advocate appears on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1 to 6.

2. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner being aggrieved by the non-consideration of the Respondents to the Petitioner’s claim for appointment on landowner basis against the vacancy caused by the retirement of Smt. Watisangla, who was serving as a Chowkidar in the PWD (R&B), Changtongya Division, Mokokchung.

3. It is the case of the Petitioner that the Petitioner’s father, Shri Purnuklu, along with others, donated the plot of land on which the Changtongya Office and the Central Store of the PWD (R&B) Sub-Division, Changtongya, were established. According to the Petitioner, the land was jointly and severely donated to the department upon a verbal assurance giv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top