SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 16642

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
ANJUWARA KHATUN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE LEVEL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE – Respondent


JUDGEMENT & ORDER (CAV)

Heard Mr. M.U. Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. A. Phukan, learned Standing Counsel for the Elementary Education Department, being respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 & 6; and Ms. D.D. Barman, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for the respondent No. 4.

2. In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the speaking order, dated 01.10.2024, issued by the Director of Elementary Education, Assam (DEE hereinafter) and also the decision of State Level Scrutiny Committee (SLSC hereinafter) dated 07.02.2024, whereby her claim for provincialisation as Assistant Teacher of Uttar Ghunimari L.P. School, was rejected.

2.1. Further, in this petition, the petitioner has also prayed for issuing direction to the respondent authorities to provincialise her service as Assistant Teacher of Uttar Ghunimari L.P. School.

Background Facts:-

3. The background facts, leading to filing of the present petition, are adumbrated herein below:-

“On 15.07.2004, the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher of Uttar Ghunimari L.P. School and she joined the school on 18.07.2004, and since the date of her joining in the sch

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top