SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 16644

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Robin Phukan, J
Md. Azizul Hoque – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
WP(C)/3521/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Z. Hammad
For the Respondents: A. Phukan

Administrative decisions regarding the provincialization of educational institutions must be based on a comprehensive assessment of all available evidence, including historical records, and must be conducted through transparent verification procedures that include appropriate notice to the applicants to ensure fairness and institutional accountability.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ jurisdiction - Provincialization of services of teachers - Eligibility criteria - Verification of enrollment data - Power of court to direct fresh inquiry when previous findings are based on incomplete evidence or lack of procedural due process.

(B) Administrative Law - Right to fair hearing - Requirement of providing notice for departmental inquiries - Failure to consider all relevant documentary evidence leads to arbitrary decision-making. (Paras 13.1, 14, 15)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged an order rejecting the provincialization of services for a school. The dispute arose from the alleged misuse of a school identity code by a former staff member. Previous administrative inquiries reached conflicting conclusions regarding enrollment numbers and physical infrastructure status. The authorities denied the claim based on an absence of certain electronic records, while the petitioner relied on physical inspection reports confirming operational status.

Findings of Court:
The court noted that administrative decisions must be comprehensive and based on all available materials. The rejection was found to be based on an incomplete assessment of enrollment records and an inspection conducted without notice, which failed to consider contrary evidence previously submitted to the authorities. (Paras 14, 15)

Issues: Whether the administrative rejection of the application for provincialization was based on a comprehensive consideration of all merit-based documents and whether the spot verification process complied with the principles of fair procedure.

Ratio Decidendi: To ensure just administrative action, authorities are required to verify the veracity of all provided evidence, including historical inspection reports, and conduct physical inquiries with transparency and proper notice to the interested parties, especially when previous adjudications remain inconsistent. (Paras 16, 17)

Result: Petition disposed of with directions for a fresh inquiry within a specified timeframe; impugned order set aside.

Table of Content
1. establishing the factual history and procedural timeline of the educational institution's claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. conflicting evidence regarding school legitimacy and the right to fair inquiry. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. requirement for comprehensive verification of enrolment data and physical status for provincialisation eligibility. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. mandatory procedural directions for administrative reconsideration of provincialisation claims. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT & ORDER (CAV)

Heard Mr. Z. Hammad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Phukan, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 5 & 6. None appeared for the respondent Nos. 3 & 4.

2. In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the Order, dated 28.04.2022, passed by the Director, Elementary Education, Assam; and also prayed for issuing direction to the respondent authorities to return the DISE code in favour of the petitioner's school and also to provincialise the service of the petitioner and the other 2 (two) teachers, on the basis of the materials available on record.

Background facts :-

3. The background facts, leading to filing of the present petition, are briefly stated as under -

"The petitioner, namely, Md. Azizul Hoque, is the Headmaster of Dakhin Kadamoni Pather L.P. School (Venture). The said school was established on 03.09.1996. The school has its own land and the petitioner, along with two other persons were appointed as Head Teacher and Assistant Teachers, respectively, vide Resolution No. 4 of the General Meeting, dated 03.09.1996, by the Managing Committee of the said school and since then, they are working regularly in the school, till date. Their names also figured in every official documents/records of the school and the DISE code No. 0102715 was issued for the year 2009-10.

Thereafter, another Assistant Teacher, namely, Md. Habibur Rahman, was appointed by the Managing Committee as 2nd Assistant Teacher on 02/01/2009, through Resolution No. 1 and he joined there and worked as 2nd Assistant Teacher till the end of 2009.

Thereafter, on 05/05/2011, an Executive meeting was conducted in the school, wherein, as per resolution No. 1, it was decided that as the earlier respondent Habibur Rahman did not give any importance to his unauthorised absence in the school therefore, as per resolution No. 2 of the said meeting, service of said Habibur Rahman was terminated and discharged.

Thereafter, on 01/01/2013, in another meeting, the Executive Committee of the said school, as per resolution No. 1, appointed one Mushida Khatun as Assistant Teacher on 01/01/2013, and she has been continuously serving in the school.

The school was last inspected by the concerned S.I. of the Schools, Batadrava Circle, on 10/10/2013, and he found everything as per the requirements.

Thereafter, on 28/02/2014, the District Elementary Education Officer, Nagaon, verified all the records and documents of the petitioners' said school and found everything genuine and correct and also recommended that DISE code can be given to the petitioners' school and accordingly, DISE code was allotted to the said school.

Thereafter, said Habibur Rahman came back from Chennai, after his unauthorised absence in the school and he came to know about his discharge from the post of Asstt. Teacher, and then he started another school in the year 2014, using same name and style as Dakhin Kadamoni Pather LP School, manufacturing and using all the documents and records of the original school headed by the petitioner and he managed the concerned Block Elementary Education Officer (BEEO), Batadrava Circle and with his help, his name was included in the DISE code of Dakhin Kadamoni Pather LP School and also submitted papers of the original school by manufacturing the same, for provincialisation of their posts and their fake school.

Thereafter, the petitioner alongwith local public subm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top