Back
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Robin Phukan, J
Md. Azizul Hoque – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing the factual history and procedural timeline of the educational institution's claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. conflicting evidence regarding school legitimacy and the right to fair inquiry. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. requirement for comprehensive verification of enrolment data and physical status for provincialisation eligibility. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. mandatory procedural directions for administrative reconsideration of provincialisation claims. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT & ORDER (CAV)
Heard Mr. Z. Hammad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Phukan, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 5 & 6. None appeared for the respondent Nos. 3 & 4.
2. In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the Order, dated 28.04.2022, passed by the Director, Elementary Education, Assam; and also prayed for issuing direction to the respondent authorities to return the DISE code in favour of the petitioner's school and also to provincialise the service of the petitioner and the other 2 (two) teachers, on the basis of the materials available on record.
Background facts :-
3.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
