Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO, J
Bhadresh Mahendrabhai Manvawala – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the present application is filed (Para 1) |
| 2. the brief facts culled out (Para 2) |
| 3. being aggrieved and dissatisfied (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. learned advocate ms.mita panchal (Para 5) |
| 5. learned app bhargav pandya (Para 6) |
| 6. since this is an application (Para 7) |
| 7. in light of the above settled (Para 8) |
| 8. the learned trial court has (Para 9) |
| 9. consequently, the present application (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER :
2. The brief facts culled out from the memo of the present application as well as the impugned judgment and order and paper book filed by the applicant are as under:
2.2 The accused was served with the summons and appeared before the learned Trial Court and his plea was recorded and the evidence of the applicant was taken on record. The applicant was examined as a witness and 05 documentary evidences were produced in support of the case and after the closing pursis at exhibit 33 was filed, the further statement of the accused was recorded under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in which he pleaded that the blank cheques were given as a security and the applicant has filed a false complaint and has failed to prove the case. The applicant has not produced any evidence to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
