HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
DALPATSINH BADESINH RATHOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORAL ORDER
1. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) , the applicant-accused has prayed for enlarging the Applicant on anticipatory bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 1 1 2 0 4 0 2 7 2 4 0 6 0 0 o f 2 0 2 4 registered with Kathlal Police Station, Kheda for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 4(3), 5(c) of the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act and Section 329(3), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S.
2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
2.1 Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted a declaration / undertaking filed by the applicant wherein it is declared by the applicant that he is not in occupation of the disputed land nor he has anything to do with the land in question. He also submitted that the present applicant was never in possession of the disputed land.
3.1 Learned Advocate for the Applicant has further submitted that the Applicant is apprehending arrest in connection the aforesaid FIR and in this connection the earlier application filed by the Applicant before the learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.