HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
M. R. MENGDEY, J
GAMBHIRSINH FULABHAI SISODIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORAL ORDER
1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
2. By way of the present appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, 1989 , the appellant-accused has prayed for enlarging the appellant on anticipatory bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11192064240097 of 2024 registered with Dholka Rural Police Station, Ahmedabad.
3. Learned advocate for the appellant has submitted that the deceased had signed a sale-deed merely in the capacity of a witness. The appellant has not usurped any land belonging to the deceased. Moreover, the parties have amicably settled the dispute outside the Court and the complainant has also no objection, if the present appellant is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. He, therefore, submitted to allow the present appeal and enlarge the present appellant on anticipatory bail subject to suitable conditions.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent – State has opposed grant of anticipatory bail.
5. Learned advocate for the original complainant submits that the FIR had been lodged by the first informant due to some misunderstandin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.