SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(GUJ) 15892

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
M. R. MENGDEY, J
GAMBHIRSINH FULABHAI SISODIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:SUDHANSHU A JHA(8345) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORAL ORDER

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. By way of the present appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, 1989 , the appellant-accused has prayed for enlarging the appellant on anticipatory bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11192064240097 of 2024 registered with Dholka Rural Police Station, Ahmedabad.

3. Learned advocate for the appellant has submitted that the deceased had signed a sale-deed merely in the capacity of a witness. The appellant has not usurped any land belonging to the deceased. Moreover, the parties have amicably settled the dispute outside the Court and the complainant has also no objection, if the present appellant is ordered to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. He, therefore, submitted to allow the present appeal and enlarge the present appellant on anticipatory bail subject to suitable conditions.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent – State has opposed grant of anticipatory bail.

5. Learned advocate for the original complainant submits that the FIR had been lodged by the first informant due to some misunderstandin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top