SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(GUJ) 27448

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
UMANG HARIBHAI THAKKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

1. This Criminal Misc. Application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is filed seeking quash of FIR No.B- 11191042200024 of 2020 registered with Satellite Police Station, Ahmedabad City, against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 506 (1), 294 (1) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (1) (r) and 3 (2) (v-a) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

2. Heard Mr.Virat Popat, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.Hardik Soni, learned APP for the respondent-State and Mr.K.V.Shelat, learned counsel for the second respondent-

defacto complainant.

3. The facts of the prosecution case in a nutshell may be stated as follows:-

3.1 The defacto complainant is the power of attorney holder in respect of the land in question said to have been executed by its original owner. It is stated that, on 17.7.2019, when the defacto complainant reached the said land and parked his four wheeler in the said land, accused no.4, who is the watchman engaged by the petitioners herein, who are accused nos.1 and 2, objected the complainant for parking his four wheeler in the said land and stated that if he parks the vehicle in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top