HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
PADMAKANT @ PRADIPKUMAR HIRALAL MISTRY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.
2. By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant-accused has prayed for enlarging the Applicant on anticipatory bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11823017230405 of 2023 registered with Rajpipla Police Station, District Narmada for offences under Sections 3, 4(1), 4(2), 4(3) and 5(e) of the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act.
3. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Pratik Barot for the Applicant and learned APP Mr. Chintan Dave for the Respondent - State.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant is apprehending arrest in connection the aforesaid FIR and in this connection the earlier application filed by the Applicant before the learned Sessions Court came to be dis-allowed. He submitted that considering the facts stated in the Application, the applicant may be granted anticipatory bail.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent – State has submitted that to the notice to the of concerned person that the land in question belonging to the Trust and therefore, they sho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.