Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
ILESH J. VORA, J
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks the release of the seized vehicle. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court hears arguments related to vehicle release. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court highlights importance of timely vehicle disposal. (Para 5) |
| 4. financier asserts rights over the seized vehicle. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. court's order to release the vehicle subject to conditions. (Para 8) |
ORDER
1. RULE. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of respondent – State.
2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed to issue a writ, order or direction directing the respondent No.1 to release/handover of custody of seized Muddamal Tata ACE Mega XL BSIV (Chhota Hathi) bearing Registration No. GJ-01-HT-0652 which came to be seized by the Investigating Officer in connection with FIR being CR No. 11216005210850 of 2021 registered with Dehgam Police Station, Dist.
Gandhinagar to the petitioner on appropriate conditions as deemed fit by this High Court.
3. Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties.
4. In support of his arguments, learned advocate for the petitioner has relied upon orders passed by this Court in Special Criminal Applic
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
