Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ, MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI, J
HARIBHAI LAKHMANBHAI SEEDHAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. heard learned counsel for the parties (Para 1) |
| 2. the present letters patent appeal (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. the matter was remanded more than once (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. a perusal of the record of the writ petition (Para 7) |
| 5. pertinent is to note that there has been (Para 8) |
| 6. on a query made by the court (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. once the ceiling proceedings were brought (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. in view of the above discussion (Para 22) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed along with an application seeking leave to appeal by the person claiming to have acquired right, title or interest in the lands in question on the basis of a Will dated 15.09.1995 of one of the original petitioners No.3/1/3, namely Puriben Gelabhai, who was one of the three wives of Gelabhai Bhagwanbhai, the original tenant whose lands had been declared surplus under the Gujarat Agricultural Land Ceiling Act, 1960 (in short as “the Ceiling Act’ 1960”). The Will executed in favour of the appellants, admittedly, had seen the light
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
