Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ, MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI, J
CHANDUBHAI SOMABHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to collector's order (Para 1) |
| 2. claim of improper notice (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. service of notice under section 21 (Para 4) |
| 4. alternative mode of service (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. computation of limitation (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. maximum relaxation period (Para 9) |
| 7. communication delivery (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 8. petition dismissed (Para 14) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)
1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record, suffice it to note that the challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 31.07.2024 passed by the Collector, Navsari rejecting the application under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act’ 2013 (in short as “the Act’ 2013”), which has been filed to assail the award passed under Section 26 of the Act, 2013 dated 11.01.2021.
2. To assail the order passed by the Collector, the contention in the writ petition is that the petitioners since long have been residing at the United States and at no point of time, they have received notice under Section 21 of the Act’ 2013 calling upon the persons interested to submit t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
