SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(GUJ) 26988

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J
ALOKSINGH BIRENDRASINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
MR ZUBIN F BHARDA(159), MR NIRAJ SHARMA, APP

ORAL ORDER

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973, for regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11200019231253 of 2023 registered with the Dungri Police Station, Valsad, for the offence punishable under Sections 120(b), 34, 465, 467, 468 , 470 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code ; Sections 6(b), 8(2),

8(4) and 10 of the Gujarat Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act , 2011.

3. Mr. Varun Bharda, learned advocate for the applicant submits that this is the successive bail application, earlier application was preferred after submission of charge-sheet, which was withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application after some time. He further submits that the present application is preferred after submission of charge-sheet and the investigation has already been completed. He further submits that the impugned FIR has been lodged against total seven persons, out of which, three have been named including the applicant-accused, and other four have not been named and sho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top