SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(GUJ) 11846

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
SUBHASHBHAI JEKISHANDAS GAEKWAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


ORAL ORDER

Rule. Learned advocates for the respective parties waives service of notice of rule for the respective respondents.

1. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the matter is taken up for final disposal forthwith.

2. Heard learned advocate Mr.Zubin F. Bharda for the petitioner, learned APP Ms.Divyangna Jhala for the respondent State and learned advocate Mr.Kishan Patel for the respondent No.2.

3. By way of this application under Article 226 and 227 of Constitution of India and under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”), the petitioner, has prayed to quash and set aside the complaint being Part-C C.R. No.11822004200766 of 2020 registered with Khergam Police Station, District : Navsari for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 409, 411 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. Brief facts of the case are as under :

The case of the petitioner is one of complete denial. It is undisputed that the petitioner is a registered contractor with DGVCL, having been awarded the contract for electrification work in the villages of Ronvel, Rankuva, Khergam, and Rumla Sub-Divisions. The petitioner has diligently carried out the e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top