Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
BHARGAV D. KARIA, D.N.RAY, JJ
EPIGRAL LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges provisional duty (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's prayer for relief (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioner's involvement in pvc (Para 5) |
| 4. petitioner's objections and participation (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. clarification on investigation details (Para 8) |
| 6. petitioner's grievance on product inclusion (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. respondent's interpretation of communication (Para 11 , 12) |
| 8. investigation process and objections (Para 13) |
| 9. court's stance on premature petitions (Para 14) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA)
1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. Mihir Joshi with learned advocate Mr. Dhaval Shah for the petitioners, learned advocate Mr. Ankit Shah for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and learned advocate Ms. Gargi Vyas with learned advocate Mr. Rajesh Sharma for respondent Nos. 4 to 6.
2. Learned Senior Advocate Mr. Mihir Joshi has tendered the draft amendment. The same is allowed in terms of the draft. To be carried out forthwith.
3. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:
“(A) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, prohibiting the respondent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
